Every single pentium 1 I have worked on, from 75MHz up to 200MHz, had a heatsink and a fan attached (or a peltier element). So lets assume they need at least a heatsink
Next: Whenever you use a heatsink you also use either:
- A thermal pad.
- A thin layer* of thermal paste.
The reason behind this is that a heatsink might look nice, flat and polished to the naked eye, but in practice the surfaces of the CPU and the heatsink are not a perfect match. There will be many small air pockets. These hinder the transfer of heat from the CPU to the heatsink. Thermal paste can be used to fill these holes. Therefor thermal paste is almost always used.
In cases where the heatsink itself is not enough and even a fan is added, you certainly want to use thermal paste.
So yes, do use thermal paste.
*: Thin because metal conducts heat better than the paste. So you want to use as little paste as possible, but enough to fill al the holes.
3It can't hurt...Of course it sounds like a larger problem, since that processor, has no thermal controls it wouldn't shut down even if it was overheating. – Ramhound – 2015-07-30T16:24:53.903
From what I understand with this part, an HSF assembly is certainly required and was supplied with the processor as sold in retail packages. It would certainly be a good idea to use thermal paste. – bwDraco – 2015-07-30T17:45:23.740
You really tried it with DOS? That said, DOS is pretty friendly on the CPU, since the vast majority of the time it's just waiting (and I'm pretty sure it doesn't busy-wait). – a CVn – 2015-07-31T08:36:07.333