150
18
I know that there's a previous question about this but it doesn't have any real answers despite having been viewed 12,400 times, and the fact that it's been closed. With that in mind...
Why in the world is 1366x768 resolution a real thing? It has an aspect ratio of 683:384, which is the weirdest thing I've ever heard of while living in a 16:9 world.
All screens and resolutions I've been familiar with have been 16:9 aspect ratio. My screen, 1920x1080, is 16:9. The 720p that I'm familiar with is 1280x720, also 16:9. 4K that I'm familiar with, 3840x2160, is also 16:9. Yet 1366x768 is 683:384, a seemingly wild break from the standard.
I know there are plenty of other resolutions all over the place, but 1366x768 seems to dominate most of the mid priced laptop world and also seems unique to the laptop world. Why don't laptops use 1280x720 or something else as a standard?
44Fyi, 4:3 was the standard ratio for TV and computer prior to HDTV overtaking it. – Andy – 2015-07-27T23:57:12.317
99Before asking this question, did you do the math to consider that 683:384 is ~16.008:9, so not such a "wild" break after all? Certainly not nearly as much so as 1280x800's 16:10. – Random832 – 2015-07-28T00:08:40.373
35@Random832 It's not like 16:10 is that weird. 1920x1200 is a completely standard resolution for many 20-24" monitors, especially in more professional settings. – SBI – 2015-07-28T07:22:50.007
13The integer ratio that you're fixated on isn't significant in any way. Expressed as a decimal, it's 1.77777... versus 1.77864583.... -- less than a millimeter difference on any desktop panel. – Russell Borogove – 2015-07-28T14:15:10.597
1I suppose you've never heard of 1024x600, with 128:75 ratio (or, approximately 5:3 if you will)? – Luke – 2015-08-01T18:10:53.913