4
I have a 1 TB HDD so I want to test for bad sectors or bad blocks but badblocks takes a LOT of time in Linux (barely 4.66% done in 6 hours 3 minutes). In Windows however chkdsk scans in a few seconds and it couldn't find any errors.
What is the difference between bad sectors and bad blocks? Also, what is the difference between chkdsk in Windows and badblocks in Linux when it comes to testing bad sectors?
Ok one thing more I wanna ask to you that creating partition on hdd will change the sector number ? So badblocks corrupted 2 days ago because of usb cable at 70% so I dont wanna wait until 70% so I started corrupted sector number which logged by badblocks. It will gives me fully reliable test? – makgun – 2015-05-26T20:23:29.483
Hmm, nothing is free but 20*6 hours sounds wrong for a consumer drive, barring dumbness like usb2. I think it took Windows less than 12 hours on a similar (but internal) drive.
badblocks
might not be optimized for modern drives. – sourcejedi – 2015-05-26T20:23:59.443sourcejedi my hdd is not modern I think. it is WD element se portable. – makgun – 2015-05-26T20:29:25.473
@makgun The sector count of the HDD won't change if you create partitions. However, CHKDSK will only test sectors allocated to windows partitions. – Dmitry Grigoryev – 2015-05-26T20:31:47.980
@dmitry-grigoryev Ok thanks your very quickly answer.! You saved me alot of time ! – makgun – 2015-05-26T20:37:04.180