3
I've tried downloading the setup files for a standalone offline installation version several times in rapid succession. Each next file has an identical size but a different hash. Why is that?
Do they embed some sort of a user identifier into each next download?
The same happens for both EXE and MSI standalone installers.
P.S. I've also noticed that the files have a digital signature with a past date (6 days ago). That means they are generating files on the fly on a machine that is simulated to have a past date. In my book this qualifies as fraud.

How are you calculating hashes? What about other browsers? Where are you downloading from? – gronostaj – 2014-09-05T09:05:28.980
Different browsers (IE, Firefox), downloading directly from google.com, using a popular tool md5deep to calculate SHA1 hashes. There are never two identical files. – guest – 2014-09-05T09:15:07.727
2I've found an installer I have downloaded on August 26 and it has a signature from June 2. We don't know if they are generating these files on the fly, maybe they have a bunch of files and are serving them sequentially. That would explain signatures from the past. – gronostaj – 2014-09-05T09:56:04.507
1It wouldn't surprise me at all to find [licenced] software that might include some dynamic payload -- such as for licencing, or for anti-piracy. A 6-day age on in the signature might indicate the pre-signing of a number of files, as a way of keeping a low-water level on the number of available downloads that are ready-to-go. I wouldn't say that would be a fraudulant action, though I would perhaps hope [wishfully] that they have some manually signed package before unsigning, modifying and re-signing automatically. Its something of a requirement for software installers to be signed these days. – Cameron Kerr – 2014-09-05T10:45:57.300
2What? Fraud of what exactly? – Ramhound – 2014-09-05T11:33:19.677
Have you performed an exact binary comparison? What is different each time? – Sun – 2014-09-15T04:38:28.793