19
4
So I noticed this on Jeff's twitter. They don't have a tld, it seems?
How've they done this? Magic, bribery, or did a no-tld tld open up recently?
19
4
So I noticed this on Jeff's twitter. They don't have a tld, it seems?
How've they done this? Magic, bribery, or did a no-tld tld open up recently?
11
I believe that the way it works is simply who ever owns the TLD .to
, simply set up an A record for the TLD itself and are providing this service.
For example, google.com
and google.com.
are actually the same address.
You can also access this site via http://to
Some domains use this technique to redirect you to where you can purchase domains from, this place seems to offer a free service.
The server seems to be down (but DNS still resolves). – Mechanical snail – 2012-08-16T05:57:38.673
1
better explanation? I do this all the time... I set up dns records for http://work which is a map, and then there is extras such as server.work server2.work etc....
– William Hilsum – 2009-12-03T18:39:27.790It doesn't redirect here - http://www.tonic.to/ ... I think that this is actually whoever owns the .to domain names set this up based on the fact that to.com (in your example) is a different website
– William Hilsum – 2009-12-03T18:46:32.8004
Just to ensure people don't miss JMD's comment:
Many more answers at Server Fault's How the heck is http://to./
a valid domain name?
http://.to
,http://to
andhttp://to.
no longer work in 2013 as they apparently did in 2009. – isomorphismes – 2013-08-26T18:13:37.0878
Same question just popped up over on ServerFault with multiple answers. :) http://serverfault.com/questions/90737/how-the-heck-is-http-to-a-valid-domain-name
– JMD – 2009-12-03T18:25:55.867@JMD: Here I was thinking I was going mad from lack of coffee... I thought I'd just seen this question. – AnonJr – 2009-12-03T18:58:19.577