2
When using a Network Attached Storage, when is it the best time to replace HDD (with RAID)? Upon failure, or proactively?
I have a Synology DS713+, with two HDD from Western Digital (WD Red, acquired at the same time), put in Synology Hybrid Raid. S.M.A.R.T. tests show no error for the moment.
I have been told that, with the current setup, my two HDD will likely fail at the same time, sometime in the future (or close enough), hinting that I should have one HDD replaced sooner, even though it is not dead yet.
Is this a current practice in RAID environment to change HDD asynchronously, in order to avoid havoc?
FYI RAID is an availability solution, not a backup solution. You should be backing this data up off the RAID somewhere. – LawrenceC – 2014-03-05T19:58:32.413
Thanks for adding the precision. I'm aware of it (what is a RAID, etc). Some sensitive data are replicated by hand on a USB HDD that I use only for this. But, would you mind to elaborate the "do not use RAID in backup system" stance? Thanks! – Marc-Olivier Titeux – 2014-03-05T20:30:28.840
1Just because a volume is RAIDed doesn't mean you shouldn't back it up on another physicaly separate volume - since you're doing that, sounds like you're doing the right thing. :) – LawrenceC – 2014-03-05T21:50:02.823
Doesn't matter too much since the rebuild time is the same regardless. – kobaltz – 2014-03-05T22:12:19.390