3
I'm going to buy a replacement AGP video card for parents' decade old Athlon XP 3200+ computer. It has Radeon 9000 with 64MB now. This videocard is crippled under Windows 7 (no WDDM driver) and it does hinder the performance I know I can get from the machine.
I'm looking at GeForce 6600, 7300 or 7600 (since they all are the same generation actually) series cards as best option in my view. I would like the card to help with 720p h.264 decoding and it seems with latest drivers for those cards it does help a bit. If somebody would advise ATI I've tried using comparable Radeon 2600XT on that system and it was flakey.
I see many 6600 and 7300 on sale for cheap. But they are 128MB usually and 256MB variants command higher price. I would like not to try it more than I need so would like to ask:
Will 128MB be enough to drive two screens (one 1024x768 and another is 1366x768) without Windows dropping Aero and with h.264 decoding working on both screens? Will it be enough if I replace 1024x768 with 1680x1050 one?
What would be your suggestion? Thank you.
It should be enough buts its very likely the problem is the fact your using hardware released 3 years before Windows 7 was even released. In other words the hardware is already a decade old. – Ramhound – 2013-10-23T13:26:20.887
software minimum specs are usually only just sufficient, and systems built to them usually don't perform well. overall, you are using XP era hardware, which isn't really sufficient for Vista and newer. – Frank Thomas – 2013-10-23T14:05:59.317
If you really want improved h.264 experience I'd say ditch Aero and prioritize the performance that matters over the eye-candy. That computer just isn't going to have the horsepower to keep up, no matter what you add to it. – James B – 2013-10-23T14:45:01.477
Guys, I do understand hardware is old. But it's still fine for the tasks my parents using computer for. It's even okey for youtube) I just want to overcome slowdowns caused by current VGA that has no WDDM driver and limited performance in Windows 7. – iskra – 2013-10-24T09:50:36.600
As I've seen and understand Aero when using with compatible card does help with offloading UI operations from CPU a bit. So it's not that it's eye candy only it does improve performance. – iskra – 2013-10-24T09:54:58.497
I don't believe this question should be closed. I'm asking about Microsoft recommendation or minimum specs for Aero and that was fully answered by Karan Raj Baruah and I'm asking about first hand experience with h.264 decoding on that cards in multimonitor configuration — and if frames are dropped or not is not an opinion is just a fact. So I don't see anything opinion based about this question and believe it had to be open – iskra – 2013-10-28T19:00:57.377