Unfortunately, in order to unpack single member of .tar.gz
archive you have to process whole archive, and not much you can do to fix it.
This is where .zip
(and some other formats like .rar
) archives work much better, because zip
format has central directory of all files contained in it with direct offsets pointing to the middle of the zip
file, so archive members can be quickly extracted without processing whole thing.
You might ask why processing .tar.gz
is so slow?
.tar.gz
(often shortened as .tgz
) is simply .tar
archive compressed with gzip
compressor. gzip
is streaming compressor that can only work with one file. If you want to get any part of gzip
stream, you have to uncompress it as a whole, and this is what really kills it for .tar.gz
(and for .tar.bz2
, .tar.xz
and other similar formats based on .tar
).
.tar
format is actually very, very simple. It is simply stream of 512-byte file or directory headers (name, size, etc), each followed by file or directory contents (padded to 512 block size with 0 bytes if necessary). When you observe totally null 512 block for a header, this means end of .tar
archive.
Some people think that even .tar
archive members cannot be accessed quickly, but this is not quite true. If .tar
archive contains few big files, you actually can quickly seek into next header, and thus you can find necessary archive member in few seeks (but still could require as many seeks as there are archive members). If your .tar
archive contains of lots of tiny files, this means quick member retrieval becomes effectively impossible even for uncompressed .tar
.
I am wondering about the same. The file I am looking for is found quickly and extracted - and then I need to wait for an hour for the rest of the achieve to be processed :o( – maasha – 2014-09-29T07:55:20.747