8
As from the subject, I want to see what's inside. I am seriously interested in finding the owner if possible and returning them, but I am worried it could be an attempt at social engineering. I own a MacBook Pro Intel with OS X v10.6 (Snow Leopard). It is a very important install.
What would you do in my situation if you want to see the content without risks? Any proposal is welcome.
I decided not to plug them in, and I brought them to the hotel reception. They will forward it to the police.
1@Arjan: since Stefano didn't replied after your last comment, can we assume you were right about his job (that is, he is working at some nuclear power plant, or secret government agency, or for a company that has very powerful and evil competitors)? :D – dag729 – 2010-06-09T09:28:50.447
@davidpostill this question is 7 years old. The linked duplicate is from yesterday. It's the other one being duplicate of this one, not the other way around. – Stefano Borini – 2017-05-06T15:11:23.100
@StefanoBorini An older question can be a duplicate of a newer one if the newer question has better answers. See Should I vote to close a duplicate question, even though it's much newer, and has more up to date answers?
– DavidPostill – 2017-05-06T15:51:06.717@StefanoBorini, I like some of the answers here better, but the other thread deals with an important consideration not covered here, the potential for a "killer USB". It's worth directing readers to the other thread based on coverage of that issue. – fixer1234 – 2017-05-06T18:03:29.707
@DavidPostill this makes no sense, for three reasons: 1. the new question should have never got to the point there are better answers, because it's the question to be duplicated, and it should have been closed even before getting answers. 2. if the answers are better, they should be part of this question, not that one. 3. my question can be edited and expanded to cover any additional cases. – Stefano Borini – 2017-05-08T13:37:30.473
@StefanoBorini If you disagree the correct place for this discussion in on [meta] not in comments. – DavidPostill – 2017-05-08T13:38:56.827
The correct place is to delete this answer. Contributing to you guys is like getting punched in the face. – Stefano Borini – 2017-05-08T14:15:52.440
2
Please do not vandalize your posts. Once you've posted a question, you have licensed the content to the Super User community at large (under the CC-by-SA license). If you would like to disassociate this post from your account, see What is the proper route for a disassociation request?
– CalvT – 2017-05-08T14:20:31.483@calvt so what's the point of a delete button if I can't delete anything? – Stefano Borini – 2017-05-08T16:30:00.370
@StefanoBorini, why are you so concerned about the direction of the duplicate? True, you posted a question earlier, but age isn't always the best basis for linking, and the direction doesn't reflect on your post or affect past or future voting. Killer USBs weren't even a thing when you asked your question. With technology questions, it's often good to try to attract new, current answers after many years. Sometimes it's a tough decision for the community as to which is the best direction for the chain of threads. (cont'd) – fixer1234 – 2017-05-08T16:47:45.197
I answered on the newer post to deal specifically with killer USBs, but I cited this thread in my answer, which may direct additional traffic here. To answer your question about the delete button, you can delete your own question before other people are affected. Once people have taken the time to answer, it isn't fair to those authors or readers to delete the question. You've created a community resource. The question and answers are fine and have attracted a lot of upvotes for yourself and other authors. Why would you want to delete the thread? – fixer1234 – 2017-05-08T16:53:39.627
@StefanoBorini If you'd clicked the delete button, you wouldn't have vandalized your post. Vandalizing your post is when you replace a post's contents (including, say, the body) with gibberish. Deleting is only allowed when other people haven't contributed things that you'd be making worthless if you deleted. – Fund Monica's Lawsuit – 2017-05-08T17:24:26.363
@fixer1234 I am not concerned with the direction of the duplicate. I am tired of contributing to a mechanism where every contribute eventually gets rewarded with a punch to the face. – Stefano Borini – 2017-05-09T06:45:01.023
> For starters, I would print 10GB USB 2.0 on a 128MB USB 1.0 flash drive if I wanted someone to pick it up... ;-) I would be more likely to pick up the smaller one. You can get a large drive for peanuts these days, but a nice, small flash-drive to use as a simple DOS boot disk or to put my mother’s 10 MP3s which take up only ~80MB on is harder to come by (especially for a reasonable price—read <$1-2). – Synetech – 2012-11-18T03:47:18.457
Of course, you don't know for sure it's a drive to start with. Even if the casing tells you it's a drive, it could be just any kind of device. – Arjan – 2009-10-31T12:18:16.770
what's a drive? I always called them like this. – Stefano Borini – 2009-10-31T12:34:30.740
He means that while it looks like a USB stick (or usb drive, usb key, usb dongle, memory stick, memory key, file tube (no, really), or one of any other hundreds of possible names because it wasn't standardized), it could actually be something else entirely, designed to LOOK like a USB stick - however I don't think it could do any damage by itself. – Phoshi – 2009-10-31T12:42:41.517
For example, a bluetooth USB dongle or a proprietary wireless mouse receiver could easily look like a USB flash drive. (No harm there, of course.) But to truly fool someone into social engineering, whatever is printed on the casing is not necessarily true. For starters, I would print 10GB USB 2.0 on a 128MB USB 1.0 flash drive if I wanted someone to pick it up... ;-) – Arjan – 2009-10-31T13:00:49.230
They were the real thing. also, pretty large. – Stefano Borini – 2009-10-31T13:02:16.813
Ah! Now we'll never know what's inside :P – Phoshi – 2009-10-31T13:07:00.443
Before I picked it up I did not know either, still I was living fine. – Stefano Borini – 2009-10-31T13:56:28.330
1Now my only hope is that it goes back to his legitimate owner. I did my part – Stefano Borini – 2009-10-31T13:57:02.340
They were the real thing. also, pretty large. -- aha, so you did plug them in after all. Or how would you know...? ;-) – Arjan – 2009-10-31T14:16:32.533
Because the size in GB was written over them, and the brand was quite known – Stefano Borini – 2009-10-31T15:22:49.017
I'm complication things, but my point was: when afraid of social engineering, then why trust the casing of the device you found? (But unless you are working at some nuclear power plant, or secret government agency, or for a company that has very powerful and evil competitors, of course chances are zero you "accidentally" found something that looks like a flash drive but in fact is a computer chip that tries to do other things...) – Arjan – 2009-10-31T17:00:54.513