0
I've tried to overclock my Intel HD Graphics 4600 in my desktop PC.
I've read elsewhere; people managed to get 1600-1700MHz (OC) instead of 1250-1300MHz (default).
The problem here is I am not unable to get reliable consistent results.
At some point I was able to get a decent record, but I'm unsure whether it was "Adaptive" or "Static" voltage as the Intel Extreme Tuning Toolkit sometimes changes this setting.
I used FurMark for these records
SCORE CLOCK VOLT
393 - DEFAULT
403 - 1350MHz
411 - 1400MHz
419 - 1400MHz (+0.085V)
408 - 1450MHz
407 - 1450MHz (+0.010V)
410 - 1450MHz (+0.005V)
415 - 1450MHz (+0.010V)
412 - 1450MHz (+0.012V)
412 - 1450MHz (+0.015V)
415 - 1500MHz (+0.010V)
411 - 1550MHz (+0.020V)
416 - 1550MHz (+0.040V)
414 - 1550MHz (+0.030V)
418 - 1600MHz (+0.080V)
418 - 1600MHz (+0.080V)
416 - 1600MHz (+0.085V)
419 - 1600MHz (+0.082V)
412 - 1600MHz (+0.084V)
422 - 1600MHz (+0.083V)
426 - 1600MHz (+0.100V)
427 - 1600MHz (+0.085V)
428 - 1600MHz (+0.095V)
435 - 1600MHz (+0.095V)
415 - 1650MHz (+0.165V)
426 - 1650Mhz (+0.175V)
426 - 1650MHz (+0.180V)
What I am thinking I am battling here is either some adaptive voltage or auto scaling.
It's quite random whether I can reproduce the results above or not.
Quite recently I even have problems reaching in the 400+ score (most scores drops below, even while being overclocked), which was not at all a problem earlier.
Without overclock as you can see the scores are from 350-400.
I do have to say... "I've read elsewhere; people managed to get" just because others have success with OC'ing, doesn't guarantee success for all in the same endeavor. – Bon Gart – 2013-07-12T15:46:30.343
Every physical processor die is different – Ramhound – 2013-07-12T15:57:34.067
sure, this is all basic OC disclaimers. However I believe results should be noticeable or at least show better results instead of randomly dropping in the 3xx-scores? – dezza – 2013-07-12T23:10:37.707