5
2
In one of my xx.stackexchange questions I've got an answer, in which the user has obfuscated his disk's SN (serial number). Recently I have seen this in several photos as well, the SN was blurred out.
I' am just curious, because I have never paid attention to this. What could be the potential risk in publishing a device's SN?
I do see some sense when it comes to a MAC address, OK, this could be used for tracking. But a SN of a disk, iPad, whatsoever? Maybe there is an important reason for not publishing it, which I haven't seen so far.
1With the serial number of a device you can perform a social engineering attack against the indivual. – Ramhound – 2012-06-19T11:25:23.730
Is there an example for this? – Horst Walter – 2012-06-19T11:48:33.943
3Risk assessment through gut feeling rather than critical thinking – Paul – 2012-06-19T12:03:21.197
Same reason people feel it's necessary to blot out their license plates in photos of their car I guess. Regardless this isn't a computer hardware or software question. Perhaps a "meta" question?? If that even. :) – Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 – 2012-06-19T12:03:48.217
The car's plate is different. Because you can track back from the plate to the owner. But is the SN registered somewhere, it could be, but not necessarily is. And where would you trace that SN owner relationship?
Regarding off topic: It is your good right to vote for close, If the majority thinks it is this way, I need to accept this. – Horst Walter – 2012-06-19T12:09:49.207
@Paul: This is what I am looking for, just done "for some reason", or really an important reason which I have not realized so far. – Horst Walter – 2012-06-19T12:13:20.140
@HorstWalter - If you have the serial number to a Garmin device you can registered it to you and then report it stolen. This means that if the real user ever calls Garmin they will refuse to help the user in question. Of course this question is really not on topic. – Ramhound – 2012-06-19T12:39:31.077