0
50.x.x.x assigned by Frontier
192.168.1.1 Actiontec (FiosModem/Router)
192.168.1.2 Voip
192.168.1.3 DLINK/DIR615 (WirelesRouter)
192.168.1.3 assigned by Actiontec
192.168.2.1 DLINK DIR615 (Hardwired to Actiontec)
192.168.2.194 Android
192.168.2.195 Vista-PC1
192.168.2.196 WIN7-PC2
192.168.2.197 Linksys-1 WRT54G/DDWRT(WirelessClient)
192.168.2.198 Linksys-2 WRT54G/DDWRT(WirelessClient)
192.168.2.199 DSi
192.168.2.197 assigned by DLINK
192.168.3.1 Linksys-1 WRT54G/DDWRT
192.168.3.100 Vista-PC3
192.168.2.198 assigned by DLINK
192.168.4.1 Linksys-2 WRT54G/DDWRT
192.168.4.100 Ubuntu-PC4
Above is my current setup.
All PCs have Internet access.
PC3 and PC4 cannot see each other and PC1/PC2 cannot see PC3/PC4.
Do I need static routes between PC3 & PC4, PC1/PC2 & PC3/PC4? If how do I create the static routes?
+1 to Darth Android's answer. @SZU, don't do double (or triple, or quadruple) NAT, unless you really know what you're doing and know why you want it. This network description is a complete nightmare. Only do NAT on the device at the head of your network (usually the integrated broadband modem / home gateway / Wi-Fi access point that came bundled with your broadband service). – Spiff – 2012-06-06T20:01:09.293
@Darth Android, thank you for your extremely quick and useful response. I was trying to get 2 PCs connected via LinksysWRT54G/DDWRT to communicate with each other and I thought there was static routing issue involved since they didn't communicate even though they all have internet access. I will try your suggestion of setting up the DD-WRT clients up as wireless bridges when I get home this evening. I would have left out the network the DLINK/DIR615 but I couldn't get the 2 LinksysWRT54Gs to link with the Actiontec Router – SZU – 2012-06-06T22:16:25.947