28
8
Is there any standard that allows a WiFi connection to be encrypted, but not require a password?
i know that (old, weak) WEP, and newer WPA/WPA2 require a password (i.e. shared secret). Meanwhile my own wireless connections are "open", and therefore unencrypted.
There is no technical reason why i can't have an encrypted link that doesn't require the user to enter any password. Such technology exists today (see public key encryption and HTTPS
).
But does such a standard exist for WiFi?
Note: i only want to protect communications, not limit internet access.
i get the sense that no such standard exists (since i'm pretty capable with Google), but i'd like it confirmed.
Claraification: i want to protect communcations, not limit internet access. That means users are not required to have a password (or its moral equivalent). This means users are not required:
- to know a password
- to know a passphrase
- to enter a CAPTCHA
- to draw a secret
- to have a key fob
- to know a PIN
- to use a pre-shared key
- have a pre-shared file
- to possess a certificate
In other words: it has the same accessibility as before, but is now encrypted.
Yes, it's only to the AP. Yet it's extremely important. Even if everybody uses https (which does not yet happen), sniffing can be used for several attack vectors. I'm very much interested in some practical and reliable solution here and I would love to see it implemented in public networks that currently rely on WEP instead. – Ivan Anishchuk – 2017-09-18T10:46:11.160
I might be wrong as I am not that network savvy, but isn't the encryption used in WPA et al only between computer and access point? And wouldn't that mean that any computer being able to access the network without password, being able to sniff the network as a whole, making the wireless encryption moot? – erikxiv – 2012-04-15T19:26:39.493
@erikxiv You would only be able to sniff packets sent to you (either directly to your address, or broadcast to everyone). Think of it like a wired network, where my laptop is wirely connecting to the hub, rather than wirelessly. – Ian Boyd – 2012-04-16T00:12:54.010