The word scan-head simply means the horizontal bar that goes up-and-down along the scanner (for flatbed scanners). It is static for auto-feed scanners.
Optical resolution
This is often given as a single number say 600dpi and is related to the amount of detail the scan-head can capture horizontally -loosely speaking.
Technically, it is the number of sensors placed per inch (horizontally) on the scan-head. In this case, there are 600 sensors horizontally per inch on the scan-head.
Side note: If the maximum paper size of a scanner is legal, then there are (600 x 8.5 = 2550) sensors along the scan-head.
some scanners using a single-pass might have 3 rows of sensors on the scan-head (this doesn't improve quality of scan, it only increases the speed).
Hardware resolution
This is often given as two numbers say 600 x 1200 dpi; the first is often the same as the optical resolution and the last is related to the quality of detail that can be captured vertically - again loosely speaking.
Technically, the last number is the number of vertical step movements of the scan-head per inch. In this case, this means the scan-head moves 1/1200 inches (vertically) per sampling - allowing for more detail to be captured vertically than one with a 1/600 step.
Maximum, Interpolated, etc resolutions
These are just software/hybrid means of increasing the resolution. They are not important because they simply add (gradient) pixels horizontally/vertically to the original scan (to give a smooth larger image); they don't add any further detail to the original scan
Verdict
Pick a scanner where the optical or hardware resolution is as high as possible.
I know that the optics: lens, type of light source and sensor technology etc play a role in scan quality, but these are out of this question's context. Oh, and don't forget to up-vote if you found this useful
Regards.
@wizlog No, of course not, that would be against the ToS :-) – mpen – 2014-08-29T15:38:31.603
1I cannot answer your technical questions but I'm a happy owner of the Lide 110 since a few weeks back. I'm also scanning old family photos and I must say I'm very satisfied with it. Fast, simple and nice quality scans. You should really treat your self with a decent scanner software though, I recommend Vuescan. – CGA – 2012-02-26T16:24:14.450
Are you asking for a shopping recommendation? – wizlog – 2012-02-26T17:18:30.240
@CGA: FYI, VueScan crashed the first time I used it, and did nothing the second but loop through the wizard over and over again the second time. – mpen – 2012-02-29T02:37:41.600