Who to believe when seeking memory upgrades?

1

This question is similar to the following: But asking the broad question of who to believe when seeking memory upgrades?

An MSI-7309 (K9N6SGM-v) Has (2) slots to fill. I am not exactly sure of the capacity.  Included below are links to conflicting specs.  I know that it can hold at least 2 Gigabytes. I would like to get 4GB in there. Without having to pay for return shipping or a restocking fee.

2GB

4GB

8GB

TheSavo

Posted 2012-02-14T15:47:47.247

Reputation: 364

Answers

1

The motherboard manufacturer latest manual version.

m0skit0

Posted 2012-02-14T15:47:47.247

Reputation: 1 317

0

Please see that the BIOS section specifically notes memory installs of 4GB located here: http://www.msi.com/product/mb/K9N6SGM-V---K9N6PGM-FI---K9N6PGM-F.html#/?div=BIOS

The manual was last updated in 2006, while the BIOS was last updated in 2008. I would assume then that the manual and newegg were never updated to reflect the newest memory availability.

Hope this helps.

jidar

Posted 2012-02-14T15:47:47.247

Reputation: 611

But is it possible that the Spec page for the board is trying to be too general, and apply to all the boards in that series? I saw that firmware update changeLog you mention. That seems to indicate that the reporting of what amount of memory was recognized. What about the memory config sites? – TheSavo – 2012-02-14T16:16:42.580

Even if the BIOS was updated to accept more RAM, probably the mobo hardware was not. – m0skit0 – 2012-02-14T16:32:48.623

It's possible, yes. But I'm willing to bet that around 2006-2007 2GB memory chips were not in the norm, and a BIOS update was needed to get that memory available to that system. It looks difficult to get very specific results for this, I don't think with my google-fu we're going to be able to determine verbatim if this is possible. – jidar – 2012-02-14T16:38:41.983

Also keep in mind that the memory controller for these boards was on the CPU, not the mainboard. Hence BIOS changes allowing for more memory as it was not a CPU limitation. – jidar – 2012-02-14T16:40:11.140

@jidar. So would looking @ the stats of the processor be more helpful? – TheSavo – 2012-02-14T17:29:56.467

I spent a few minutes reading wikipedia on this when I first answered your question and didn't see any hard numbers backing up the memory controllers limitations. Being a 64bit processor, I'd assume this is basically a non-issue (as a memory controller). – jidar – 2012-02-14T17:46:21.010