3
I have a i3 based system running Windows 7. I have noticed that even during intense activities like copying GBs of data the CPU doesn't exceed 25%. I have no malware.
Some questions based on that observation.
Is that kind of usage normal for such an operation? I haven't done any major 3D rendering and such so I wouldn't know if the CPU might be used closer to 100%. Would it?
Isn't there a way to speed p a long operation by assigning only that to one of the cores and letting other cores do the regular chores?
Is it just a fact that most of us have computers way too powerful for any of our need and CPUs will be inevitably underused?
For an everyday application that does use all of your CPU, have a look at 7-zip ( http://www.7-zip.org/ ). Compressing/decompressing big files with it, you should see your CPU at 100%.
– schnaader – 2011-12-19T19:20:22.1903Why exactly do you want your computer to use more then 20% of your CPU, if it does that, then your performance will suffer. Try running a more resource intensive program, your cpu usage will increase, copying a file is not CPU intensive its I/O intensive – Ramhound – 2011-12-19T19:38:21.963
"I have noticed that even during intense activities like copying GBs of data the CPU doesn't exceed 25%." How is copying data "intensive"? CPU cache = 100 GB/s, RAM = 20 GB/s, hard drive = 0.1GB/s. Also, the CPU doesn't really do much here. Compiling applications is an example of a CPU-intensive task. – Breakthrough – 2011-12-19T19:48:12.503
http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/ <== You wanna see 100%? Use this. – WernerCD – 2011-12-20T02:23:56.340