8
5
You've most certainly read it on the internet, and you may have even heard other supposedly computer-savvy people suggest that deleting temporary files speeds up your (Windows) computer.
But how does that actually work? Drawing on my limited theoretical knowledge of file systems and disk drives, I cannot understand how deleting temporary files should improve file system performance unless the disk is nearly full. How can a temporary file that just sits there impair performance? Can somebody offer a technical explanation of why deleting temporary files (and cookies, and prefetch files) should or shouldn't have an effect on performance?
Edit: It appears that Microsoft thinks so.
5Since I haven't "read it on the internet", please provide some links. – sawdust – 2011-10-24T05:53:45.017
A quick search yielded these results. Plenty of people seem to think that deleting temporary files speeds up your computer. Even a Microsoft page suggests so! But I have a hard time understanding exactly how a file that just sits there doing nothing can impair performance (unless in the case of very limited storage space).
– InvalidBrainException – 2011-10-24T07:44:51.4431@Terribad: you might want to include the links directly in your question, to prevent further upvotes of the above "please provide some links" comment – Rabarberski – 2011-10-24T07:59:21.303
@Rabarberski: Ha ha, point taken. I assume that most Windows "super users" have tried to perform some sort of optimization on their computer, and in attempting to do so have used Internet search engines for relevant information, and in doing so have encountered common Windows maintenance advice such as "delete your temporary files". :) I chose not to provide links in my original question because there are so many relevant websites for the world's most popular operating system, but I suppose I should include the Microsoft link since it is presumably more authoritative. – InvalidBrainException – 2011-10-24T10:49:14.160