23
3
I need to change my firewall/router, and I'd prefer something with built-in DNS to resolve queries on the local subnets. I've got a mixed Linux/Windows system, often with only one computer turned on, and I frequently have problems resolving local names. I don't want to keep a Linux box permanently on just for DNS, and I'd prefer to have DNS in my router appliance, which is always on.
I search Google for this occasionally but never find anything. You always get the obvious answers - it's not possible, put everything in /etc/hosts
, NetBIOS, dedicated box, etc. So what am I missing? Why don't "cheap" routers let you do this? I'm pretty sure that Cisco kit does this. Almost all cheap routers will let you do MAC address reservation, to let them assign static IP addresses for DHCP. So why can't they simply do DNS as well for everything on the local subnets, just passing through remote domains to the ISP?
some @Grumby on a whirlpool forum said that a public domain name costs less than a dedicated router/DNS server hardware to do local DNS. I just set up a new domain and set up synthetic subdomain forwarding in about 20 minutes to the same effect for only $12. So if you want something you can have up and running for cheap without having to get any new hardware don't forget that is an option. – ComradeJoecool – 2019-10-16T01:20:43.607
3Get a Linksys WRT54GL for around 50$, install OpenWRT firmware on it and you'll have a DNS server that resolves local names. But still pretty much offtopic on stackoverflow... – fvu – 2011-07-18T11:56:18.377
2Don't forget the other classics, DD-WRT and Tomato! – Darth Android – 2011-07-18T14:06:33.920