VMWare Server replacement?

2

2

Now that VMWare Server is EOA and end of support soon, what should I use for tests and development for several Linux systems at home?

Ability to run headless and gains in performance due to being bare metal is what i will miss.

ilya

Posted 2011-02-24T10:22:44.587

Reputation: 23

1You can't get much more 'bare metal' than ESXi (or vSphere Hypervisor now) – charlesbridge – 2011-02-24T12:19:31.963

I liked the simple web-based configuration and being headless. – Russell – 2012-03-17T12:06:49.793

Answers

4

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Do you have a support contract that VMware won't honour or something, are you constantly finding show-stopping bugs in VMware Server that prevents you from working on it until a patch is issued?

That said, Citrix XenServer has been free for a while now.

ta.speot.is

Posted 2011-02-24T10:22:44.587

Reputation: 13 727

2

You can run virtualbox headless, and get some degree of web based management with phpVirtualBox. Otherwise, you pretty much get what you do with VMware server - i run an instance on a little atom box.

Journeyman Geek

Posted 2011-02-24T10:22:44.587

Reputation: 119 122

1

VMware vSphere Hypervisor (aka ESXi) is a free, bare-metal hypervisor. It's easy to migrate your VMs from VMware Server to vSphere using VMware Converter. In addition to running your existing VMs, vSphere can be upgraded later to add features such as redundancy and live migration.

If you don't need to run your VMs headless, you could use VMware Player (free) or VMware Workstation ($200), both of which can also easily import your existing VMs. VMware Workstation 8 also includes a new sharing feature.

Depending on what kind of testing you do, you might be interested in the clone and snapshot features in vSphere and Workstation. These features make it easy to configure and rollback test machines.

One of the reasons we've retired VMware Server at my office is that the management plugin is no longer updated, and won't run in newer versions of Firefox.

rob

Posted 2011-02-24T10:22:44.587

Reputation: 13 188

1

I use Proxmox VE myself for about 3 years now, very happy about it. It's basically KVM + OpenVZ + Debian + their own custom webui. It's very user-frinedly, you manage it form the web much like the old VMware server.

I didn't want to go with VMware vSphere or Citrix XenServer as they both run on hypervisor kernels, and may have rather picky hardware requirements.

It comes with KVM guest VM images and OpenVZ-enabled guest kernels for many major Linux distro, available for download within the VM guest setup screen.

There were any mature KVM distro when I selected Proxmox VE, but apperently there's another one based on RHEL/CEntos called OpenNode

http://opennode.activesys.org/

Or you can use regular RHEL/Centos/Debian/Ubuntu distro and add the KVM management tools you want.

http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Management_Tools

goofrider

Posted 2011-02-24T10:22:44.587

Reputation: 146

0

I found vmware player to have the best performance for local vm's(out of VBox, and vmware), and I use powershell to launch a vmware player VM without a window opening.

Russell

Posted 2011-02-24T10:22:44.587

Reputation: 211

0

There are a couple options:

  1. Proxmox
  2. Citrix XenServer
  3. Linux + KVM **

** This will required additional setup, but there are some good guides for CentOS, such as http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/centos-rhel-linux-kvm-virtulization-tutorial/ It isn't completely headless, but you can remove, or ignore the GUI elements. Administration can be done via SSH, or you can install something like Archipel

ntw1103

Posted 2011-02-24T10:22:44.587

Reputation: 1 186