4
1
I am looking for a solid state drive for my laptop.
My dillemma: I have been waiting for the new Intel SSDs since Q3/2010, as I've heard they should be better and cheaper, due to lower memory manufacturing costs.
Now it looks like the new Intel drives are very fast, but still expensive. I would still buy one of them if I could benefit from the full speed. My hardware only has a SATA-2 port though.
Thus, my question:
- Is it worthwhile to buy an SSDs made for SATA-3 if I won't be able to use the full speed?
I don't consider this question subjective, as I am mainly looking for answers concerning the SATA-2/SATA-3 conflict.
Edit: Removed model-related questions
1In response to some of what you have, there is no performance penalty for using a SATA3 drive on a SATA2 chipset. As for your last two questions, there are many promising SSDs that are being released every week, and it is your duty to choose which is best for you - not this community's. – Breakthrough – 2011-02-22T21:35:18.560
1I updated my question and removed the model-related parts. – Danilo Bargen – 2011-02-23T09:48:21.773
It's more a shopping type question asking if you think people will benefit still from a purchase – random – 2011-02-24T04:54:00.580
random: No, since the edit, it's not a shopping question anymore. Even though it's asked in a shopping context, it's more of a performance question. I think the way the question looks right now, it belongs to Superuser and should be reopened. The purpose of this shopping rule is to prevent questions that become irrelevant quickly, because new products emerge. This is not the case for the SATA2/SATA3-performance-comparison. – Danilo Bargen – 2011-02-24T10:24:05.673