2
I'm currently running a AMD Phenom X4 9600 processor (yeah, it's aging a bit, but other recent problems mean it's not getting upgraded in the immediate future), which happens to be one of the chips that suffer from the TLB errata.
I recall that the first time I played with disabling the TLB patch (probably over a year ago, while playing a game that had a severe performance problem such that it was almost unplayable unless the patch was disabled) I had at least one BSOD, but I can't remeber them being particularly frequent. However, because it decreased instability, I stopped disabling the patch once I was done with the game.
Now, after some recent hardware changes I was experiancing much worse performance than expected from the new hardware under some circumstances, and the TLB jumped to mind - after testing I found that disabling the patch would improve the performance to expected levels.
I'm now wondering if it's worthwhile always having the patch disabled to avoid any potential slowdowns cropping up in the future, or if it is too dangerous. Everything I read states that the bug, when not patched, can causes a system lock-up in "rare circumstances".
So, with the TLB patch disabled:
How frequently should system lock-ups be expected?
Do we know what the circumstances that trigger the lock-ups are?
(Don't worry too much about being highly technical, but essentially I wonder if the chip more vunerable under heavy load, or heavy memory usage, etc?)Are there any secondary problems I should be aware of?
(Don't include things that are charateristic to all lock-ups, please)
Thanks, that's good enough for me. I'll run with the patch disabled for a while, if I hit any real problems I'll update here. – DMA57361 – 2011-01-11T12:11:07.953
Update: I've been using the patch disabled since my last comment and as a result receive maybe one or two BSOD crashes per week, most often while gaming, but otherwise the machine is stable. – DMA57361 – 2011-05-09T13:26:47.913