What to you use as a "fuser -v -n tcp" alternative on Mac OS X

10

1

The fuser command on Mac OS X is rather primitive and can't check for processes listening on a specific port. Does anybody know a good alternative? It it enough to know which process listening on that one port.

Martin

Posted 2010-12-23T16:57:04.543

Reputation: 305

1Try sudo lsof -i -P – vcsjones – 2010-12-23T17:02:21.760

I was under the impression that lsofonly works when a task actually connects to the port. Besides one would need at least a| grep portno` as well to get a meaningful result. – Martin – 2010-12-23T18:09:21.530

Answers

14

As @vcsjones said in the comments, lsof is the tool for this:

$ sudo lsof -i tcp:80
COMMAND PID   USER   FD   TYPE     DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
Safari  804 gordon   16u  IPv4 0x05a2cec8      0t0  TCP 192.168.6.3:50542->stackoverflow.com:http (ESTABLISHED)
httpd   874   root    3u  IPv6 0x05a2a940      0t0  TCP *:http (LISTEN)
httpd   878   _www    3u  IPv6 0x05a2a940      0t0  TCP *:http (LISTEN)

Without the -i, it shows all open files; with just -i it shows network files only; if you specify something after the -i you can restrict by any or all of: IPv4/6, TCP/UDP, hostname or IP, and port number/service name.

Gordon Davisson

Posted 2010-12-23T16:57:04.543

Reputation: 28 538

2Just in case it's useful for someone like me looking to blindly kill all processes using a given port: lsof -i tcp:5000 | grep LISTEN | awk '{print $2}' | xargs kill kills all processes listening on port 5000 – JeremyKun – 2016-06-28T21:02:45.337