4
1
I've got quite simple question actually. How green, low-power and efficient x86 home server can I build using consumer parts with rather constrained budget.
After looking through some Google hits I've found out that system based on dual-core atom, some modest mITX board (gigabit lan, integrated audio and gfx etc), one RAM module and one 'green' WD HDD, powered by picoITX PSU uses about 30W at idle up to 40 at load.
Can you get lower (or how much lower) then that? Maybe some VIA nano chips, or single core atom?
My home server would take care of some back-upping mixed with little ftp/http traffic.
2Non-x86 platforms can have lower power usage. Why does it need to be x86? – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams – 2010-11-09T00:31:45.613
You're likely to get lower power with non-x86 processors, possibly ARM. Then you wouldn't be able to run Windows (you'd probably run Linux instead — it's more suitable to the uses you describe anyway). Is that a problem? – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' – 2010-11-09T01:13:06.067
1an SSD seems like the best way to drop the power usage (no moving parts to power, for example) – Trezoid – 2010-11-09T01:43:14.593
1I would prefer x86 platform for its versality. And with windows server, I wont have to ask about samba or media streaming between linux and win7. – Halik – 2010-11-09T14:48:37.180