0
I am a new owner of Dell 7567 and planned to connect two external monitors to it, but unfortunately, the manufacturer only provided one HDMI port.
So I google about it, and just found out that there exists an USB-VGA adaptor, so bought I it and tried it. With a bit of hassle, I can get it to work, but it has a slight delay input also has a huge performance impact.
I have 2 monitors, monitor A plugged to HDMI, monitor B plugged to USB-VGA adaptor, if there is nothing moving (video etc) played on monitor B, it works perfectly, I can play game on monitor A with solid 60 fps, but when there is something moving on monitor B (youtube), my game on monitor A dip into 40 fps
I stumbled upon Dell docking station with DisplayLink tech in it Dell Docking Station, and I also found Plugable USB-Display Adaptor, so my question is, how much of the overhead the DisplayLink and Pluggable cause ?, which one is better?, and is it even better than my "cheap" (can't really say its cheap) alternative generic USB-VGA adaptor that bought?
1I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the question is asking the reason the manufacturer used DisplayPort instead of HDMI. – Ramhound – 2018-07-10T11:38:26.503