1
0
Apparently, SAMBA no longer wants to support SMBv1, leaving an old Windows 2000 machine in our shop unable to connect. I tried adding "min protocol = NT1"to smb.conf, but this has not helped.
Is the NT1 code completely gone? Or what am I missing?
Updated: Here is the (revised) global section:
[global]
workgroup = AFAR
server string = Shadow (Linux/Samba Server)
hosts allow = x.x.x.x,y.y.y.y,z.z.z.z
disable netbios = no
printcap = cups
load printers = yes
printing = cups
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 0
security = user
passdb backend = tdbsam
encrypt passwords = yes
min protocol = NT1
client min protocol = NT1
server min protocol = NT1
My situation is that I have an old Windows 2000 machine that hosts a development environment for a legacy embedded product. It needs to mount a Linux-hosted file system in order to access the CVS code database. It has worked well for 12 years. In the last week we lost power, and upon reboot, the Win2K machine failed to mount any of its SAMBA file systems. The SAMBA host has been updated several times, and other clients have had issues with patches that caused temporary incompatibilities, but obviously the Win2K machine is not getting Windows updates.
When Win2K tries to mount the SAMBA files, it gets a generic authentication error: "Wrong username or password".
I will be looking at Wireshark traces of the failure next, but I was hoping someone else had ideas.
Samba is 4.5.14 (from Fedora 25)
@Ramhound: I added both client min protocol = NT1 and server min protocol = NT1 but it still fails. – Lars Poulsen – 2017-12-12T17:28:24.343