1
The context: We're seeking a video-conference solution that does screen sharing with minimal requirements. WebRTC-based solutions are great, they work fine on a least Firefox and Chromium. Unfortunately, screen sharing requires a plugin on Chromium. We tried both Jitsi and NextCloud's WebRTC feature.
AFAIU, due to a technical restriction, there are no WebRTC solutions that don't require a plugin for screen sharing on Chromium. Is this correct?
Since it works on Firefox, I assume it is a design choice in Chromum, not a technical limitation in the protocol. Is there a chance it will work in Chromium in the future?
In other words, is this planned in Chromium's roadmap? Or should we look for another technology?
@downvoter, anything I could do to improve / migrate this question? – Jérôme – 2018-10-10T12:28:18.497
Software Recommendations Stack Exchange – jww – 2018-10-11T06:28:28.863
@jww but the question was not really about a software alternative because as I assumed, the limitation is not in the plugin but in the browser, so changing plugin won't help. The question was about Chromium roadmap. I just added the context and left it open to alternative suggestions. – Jérôme – 2018-10-11T07:03:14.667
But you asked for a recommendation on a video conferencing solution: "We're seeking a video-conference solution that ... [add requirements]". I believe that's what makes the question off-topic, and why it may be better to ask on another site like Software Recommendations Stack Exchange. Perhaps the question can be reworded to move it away from a recommendation.
– jww – 2018-10-11T19:46:23.450@jww I rephrased to make it clearer. Close or reopen as you wish. I'm not searching anymore. Just leaving this for future reference. – Jérôme – 2018-10-12T08:04:57.550
Apps like https://meet.google.com don't require plugin. This is on chrome 69
– deathangel908 – 2019-04-12T09:00:22.953