1
I'm new to cygwin (and *nix for that matter) and don't understand the following gdb behavior. I've created an executable that intentionally results in a SIGSEGV:
#include <iostream>
void Func(int i)
{
int* pFoo = NULL;
*pFoo = 1;
}
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
Func(-50);
std::cout << "End of main()" << std::endl;
}
I compile my code by doing:
g++ test.cpp
Using this version of g++:
g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 5.4.0 Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
When I try to run this program in gdb, I'm unable to "see" any variables:
>gdb ./a.exe
GNU gdb (GDB) (Cygwin 7.10.1-1) 7.10.1
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-pc-cygwin".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.
For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from ./a.exe...done.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/user/code/gdbtest/a.exe
[New Thread 6500.0x1c84]
[New Thread 6500.0x7a0]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000010040111d in Func(int) ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x000000010040111d in Func(int) ()
#1 0x000000010040113c in main ()
(gdb) f 0
#0 0x000000010040111d in Func(int) ()
(gdb) p i
No symbol "i" in current context.
(gdb) p pFoo
No symbol "pFoo" in current context.
(gdb) info locals
No symbol table info available.
(gdb) f 1
#1 0x000000010040113c in main ()
(gdb) p argc
No symbol "argc" in current context.
(gdb)
Can someone explain why this happens and how I can correct the problem?
I also tried compiling using "g++ -Og test.cpp" but it resulted in no change to the above described.
This worked to (as well as just "-g"). Still curious why "-Og" did not work, as my reading of the manual led me to think it ought to have. Also curious why neither "-g" nor "-ggdb" are required on my work PC (which is true *nix). Just curious on these points, but you've solved my query; thank you. – StoneThrow – 2016-08-06T06:35:53.137