A theoretical lifespan of 1000 years is actually not that big. Factory-produced CD-ROMs which were replicated from a master-disk are expected to last for 100 years or more, but of course you cannot put your data on these. Next come gold-plated CD-R and DVD-R disks which are claimed to last for about 100-200 years by the manufacturer. Those claims are based on accelerated ageing tests, just like with M-Disks, so for me they sound just as valid. I still have my CD-Rs I have recorded 20 years ago, so the lifespan of regular CD-R disks is not 5 years like you said, unless perhaps you go for the cheapest ones. But if you really have found that disks which should last 100 years only last 5 in your environment, I would reasonably expect that a 1000-year lifespan disk should last about 50.
The real problem your descendants will likely to encounter in 100 years (let alone 1000 years) is to find the equipment to read the old disks you have left them. Typical CD and DVD drives are designed to last for 5 to 10 years of normal usage, and have perhaps 15 to 30 years of shelf life. It's hard to predict for how many more years CDs and DVDs will remain in use, but they will disappear eventually, and then your kinds will have a hard time reading those disks no matter how much you have paid for them.
Personally, I keep my data on a couple of hard drives, and copy it over to newer ones every 10 years or so. Sure, I'll need 200 HDDs over a thousand years, but I won't ever encounter troubles reading my backups on modern computers, and the capacity will keep growing over time, accommodating new data. If I decided to use M-disks instead, I'd have to buy new disks for new data ($30 for 50 GB on amazon) every year, so it would be more expensive, and my old M-disks would still age.
14you will only really know in 1000 years. – Musselman – 2016-07-29T06:21:33.827
1something about using just one disk being less sensible than re-recording on multiple disks with backup copies, etc and so forth – user1306322 – 2016-07-29T09:14:05.500
Seems dodgy, as they're sending something back that is supposedly readable by home cd/dvd drives, so there will be fairly strict tolerances on to how much they can change the disk. Plus who cares if my CD has stone in the middle of it, as the data is on the surface layers! So all this seems to be doing is maybe preventing snapped discs. – cjb110 – 2016-07-29T09:55:12.690
1@Xavierjazz This isn't necessarily spam. M-disk compatibility is already being advertised in otherwise normal CD drives that make it to OEMs (and probably individual buyers). Hence, for those that do already have this drive (I wasn't even aware of this until I began looking for low-level details on my OEM's drive) this is a question of selecting a recording medium based on technical merits and drawbacks. – Reinstate Monica - ζ-- – 2016-07-29T11:36:54.983
If you put the amazon link in, Stack Exchange will get the referral bonus if anyone buys it. (Just a thought.) – wizzwizz4 – 2016-07-29T14:33:35.547
I wouldn't bother with M-DISC. Gold-based archival discs aren't hard to find; I'd probably use Verbatim UltraLife Gold. – bwDraco – 2016-07-29T17:20:35.847
Paper, when stored under the right conditions, can last many thousands of years. (You can even make back-ups on it!)
– Ben N – 2016-07-29T23:24:07.917