0
Question: I'm aware that the OS runs much faster on an SSD than on a HDD.
I'm still confused though. I want to do live DJing with my computer.
Essentially l need to simultaneously do 3 things very fast:
Fast 1: Run DJ software
Fast 2: Load songs and samples (to trigger alongside the songs)
Fast 3: Record everything on a multitrack music program
As l see it, running the OS (booting up OS, opening browser, opening calculator, changing font size etc. etc.) need not be so fast (I only want to use that computer in one acute situation: live DJ performances). Therefore am l OK to relegate running OS as:
Slow 1: Running OS
... or is it that the OS's activity is intertwined with Fast 1, 2 & 3? And therefore the OS would also need to be fast?
My current plan:
HDD: For running the OS
SSD: Install DJ program here. Also install multitrack program here. Also store songs and samples.
This also raises another question: surely, recording into a multitrack program, whilst simultaneously also playing tunes via a DJ program, all on the same SSD drive, with the songs and samples also being loaded on that SSD drive, would slow the SSD down?
Therefore should I have at least 1 more SSD for the multitrack recording? And perhaps 1 more for the tunes and samples?
Please help, as I'm about to add a million SSDs to my shopping and this could be costly. I hope I'm missing something here, and that all I will need is 1 HDD and 1 SSD.
Oh and there's the original question as well: could the OS go on the HDD rather than the SSD?
Assumptions: the computer is equipped (speed, memory, drive size) for the task.
Hello, thanks for your reply - v. valuable. There's a lot of hearsay about SSDs on web forums isn't there. I read elsewhere that you must have an SSD for live multitrack recording, but now that you mention it, yep, it actually floats about in the RAM doesn't it. I hope to use about 32GB RAM. So... I've purchased a 1TB HDD and a 480GB SSD. I guess we can call this "overkill" already. I think l'll just stash everything onto the SSD .... – A_Cat_an_Actual_Cat – 2016-05-07T16:00:21.090
Yeah. An SSD is great for loading and saving stuff quickly, but its being hyped more than it needs to be. People don't understand the principle behind it and make wrong connections. For example, if you have little system memory and you put your swapfile on the SSD, it already will seem fast. But an SSD can't beat RAM simply by how RAM is wired inside the computer. There are even people who put multiple SSD's in a RAID configuration. Sure it'll be faster, but just an SSD is already very fast. If my answer helped you, feel free to accept it so others know you don't need any more help. – LPChip – 2016-05-07T17:50:31.030
How do i "accept" a response? – A_Cat_an_Actual_Cat – 2016-05-07T19:57:11.060
There is a grey checkmark on the left of my answer. Click it so it turns green. – LPChip – 2016-05-07T20:39:58.377
Done. Thanks for your advice :) Saved me approx. £60. Maybe even 2 x £60. – A_Cat_an_Actual_Cat – 2016-05-07T22:05:20.747