-1
Whenever I setup K-Lite codec pack, like during an MPC install, this step of K-Lite always trips me up:
It is never clear to me what is going on. No matter what I choose I will first have to decide what software package I am going to use to handle decoding and splitting.
The defaults seem to work but it is not made clear why this is important enough for me to care about.
Then comes hardware acceleration:
If I choose the "Simple" setup mode then I don't see this screen and I don't get to know if it is choosing software decoding because it is the first option in the list or because it is the best option for my system. Likewise if I choose a different setup mode I don't know if it is choosing software decoding because it is the first option or if it's the best option. Even further the options I am given to choose from have cryptic names. Am I given these options because my system supports them or because K-Lite does? I have no way of knowing.
As a layman I would just want video decoding to work optimally for my system. As someone with some technical knowledge I would want it to be decoded via hardware if I had it available and if I was an advanced user I would know exactly where I wanted it to be decoded.
Is it possible for software to detect what my system is capable of? Is the K-Lite installer already doing this?
What exactly is going on here?
Why do you even consider K-Lite. Use VLC, that can play anything. http://www.videolan.org/vlc/index.html
– whs – 2016-02-06T01:47:31.067@whs k-lite has other uses besides video consumption. Other application workflows can depend on the codecs that it provides – user1886419 – 2016-02-06T02:49:17.617
Maybe K-lite is better now. But years ago when I tried to use it I had nothing but problems. And for playback it is certainly not needed. – whs – 2016-02-06T13:23:22.987