-1
Please see the benchmark below:
HD Tune Pro: Crucial_CT512MX100SSD1 Information
Firmware version : MU01
Serial number : 14420D871481
Capacity : 512.1 gB (476.9 GB)
Buffer size : n/a
Sector size : 512 bytes
Standard : SATA 3 (6.0 Gb/s)
Supported mode : UDMA Mode 6
Current mode : UDMA Mode 6
Avergae speed : 4069 MB/s
Rotation speed : 0 RPM (SSD)
S.M.A.R.T : yes
48-bit Address : yes
Read Look-Ahead : yes
Write Cache : yes
Host Protected Area : yes
Device Configuration Overlay : yes
Firmware Upgradable : yes
Automatic Acoustic Management: no
Power Management : yes
Advanced Power Management : yes
Interface Power Management : no
Power-up in Standby : no
Security Mode : yes
SCT Tables : yes
Native Command Queuing (NCQ) : yes
Trim : yes
Volume : System Reserved
Capacity : 349 MB
Free : 90 MB
Usage : 74%
File system : NTFS
Serial : 2669-6089
Alignment : 2 MB
Volume : (C:)
Capacity : 487583 MB
Free : 364608 MB
Usage : 25%
File system : NTFS
Serial : E86C-270D
Alignment : 1 MB
Volume :
Capacity : 449 MB
Free : 129 MB
Usage : 71%
File system : NTFS
Serial : E6FB-5143
Alignment : 2 MB
PowerUser
Posted 2016-01-20T15:59:52.813
Reputation: 11
Could be typical if your OS doesn't support TRIM and you have written to a lot of the drive. What OS? – Mokubai – 2016-01-20T16:11:39.527
Or if (like me) you attached the drive to a controller without TRIM. – Hennes – 2016-01-20T16:30:26.370
Even without TRIM the write would only be reduced, not the read. That drive should be a lot faster. Benchmark it on a bootable OS first to rule out software. – Linef4ult – 2016-01-20T16:55:31.630
Looks like classic SATA-300 speeds. Also potential write bottleneck from lack of cache, or just crappy SSD. – qasdfdsaq – 2016-01-20T17:24:46.443
is your question answered? – magicandre1981 – 2016-01-30T08:21:03.927