35
17
I like to print PDFs of my documents. I've been using PDFCreator. Is this a good choice, are there any better solutions?
35
17
I like to print PDFs of my documents. I've been using PDFCreator. Is this a good choice, are there any better solutions?
32
CutePDF Writer is working well for us (way less flaky than the slightly old version of Acrobat we are running at work, anyway)
EDIT: There is also information in the CutePDF FAQ about using parameters to change the print quality/file size settings which we have found useful for larger documents.
4We've found it is better at generating PDFs from Crystal reports than Crystal Reports itself... – Rowland Shaw – 2009-07-15T20:03:39.157
6@Rowland: then again, writing the binary yourself would probably be better than using Crystal Reports' 'functionality'... – Andy Mikula – 2009-07-15T20:20:27.710
Thank you! Total life saver! I had to save a form that was supposed to be displayed as pdf, but Chrome didn't recognize it as such. CutePDF did exactly what I needed :) – Sverre Rabbelier – 2011-03-10T23:07:27.493
+1 Doesn't bug you like some options. – Daniel A. White – 2009-07-16T12:52:49.847
23
I prefer PDFCreator over the other tools. Much more flexibility than the others but probably is an overkill for simple purposes.
PDFCreator is my favorite as well. – Justin Dearing – 2009-07-31T13:04:42.597
I had two problems with PDFCreator: If im printing something like a presentation, the margins are white. Maybe there is an option to change that.
Rhe other is that sometimes I cant find the save dialog box. And when it appears, there is a list of all the pdf prints Ive ordered. – Artur Carvalho – 2009-07-16T18:21:33.260
1The margins are white because your presentation software has a print margin set. If you use borderless printing (assuming the software supports it) you'll get PDFs with no border. – AnonJr – 2009-07-17T11:45:56.743
I love that PDFCreator will let you create the end result in more than one format, and you can use it to "merge" multiple documents into one PDF - great if you have different people working on different chapters of a user manual... – AnonJr – 2009-07-17T11:49:02.180
15
Using the built-in Export to PDF option in OpenOffice.org has one VERY major advantage over anything that simulates a printer: it creates clickable table of contents, cross-references, indexes and explicit internet links. Of course, most PDF viewers will recognise some URLs and email addresses. But when linking some text to some URL, most PDF printers do not make that into a clickable link. That's simply because the print processor does not "tell" the PDF printer about this.
As a side note: on a Mac, PDF is very much integrated. Still, when using OpenOffice.org on a Mac, one should also explicitly use Export to PDF -- using the Save to PDF option from a Mac's print dialog does not create clickable links. However, some other Mac programs do in fact somehow send such information to the Mac's print processor, through the print dialog. For example, when saving to PDF using the print dialog in Pages, Safari or OmniWeb (the latter being non-Apple software), all links are in fact clickable. (On a Mac, when one does NOT want clickable links when saving a web site as PDF, one should in fact use Firefox instead.)
By the way: getting a clickable table of contents is a very good reason to learn how to use styles and headers. One should never have to create a table of contents manually!
Yeah, Macs have fantastic PDF support. And using the new trackpads to zoom in and out (or even rotate) is really great. – Artur Carvalho – 2009-07-16T18:22:44.367
11
If it's Office 2007 applications that you're printing from, there's an add-in to provide a Save as PDF option:
Any idea if this creates clickable table of contents, cross-references and so on? – Arjan – 2009-07-15T10:17:34.643
Yes, I've used it for converting a number of technical manuals I've authored with large tables of contents and lots of cross references, and these were all clickable in the resultant PDF. – Sliff – 2009-07-15T11:14:17.330
10
I used primo pdf since a while, and it works great
Yup; use this all the time. – Steve Melnikoff – 2009-07-15T20:18:38.603
5
I use doPDF and it is very successful. And free...
doPDF installs itself as a virtual PDF printer driver so after a successful installation will appear in your Printers and Faxes list. To convert to PDF, you just have to print the document to doPDF.
5
I use pdf995. Shareware, but the license isn't too expensive and it works really nicely. Also has the ability to split and merge pdfs, add watermarks and more.
I use it too, it has good quality, it's great if you don't mind the ads – djeidot – 2009-07-15T22:27:23.647
I used to use it too, but the adds are pretty annoying. Switched to CutePDF – kristof – 2009-07-16T11:28:24.847
4
OpenOffice is another option.
3
Another option (the one I used to use until all the other programs listed here came out) is to install a printer driver for a Postscript printer, connected to the FILE:
port.
When you print to that printer, you'll get a postscript (.ps
) file. You can then open that using Ghostscript and Ghostview and convert them to PDF from there.
2
I've used Bullzip pdf printer for a year or so and have been very happy with it.
It installs as just another printer, so is available to any application.
It's reliable, does watermarks, pdf merging, no ads, simple to use and good quality output.
2
If "free" is not a requirement I would suggest Adobe Acrobat. It still is the most professional tool for creating PDFs.
2
Google Docs download as PDF option is the best option if you want to convert your documents to PDF on the fly without installing anything...
1
I use pdfFactory.
0
We are using FreePDF (formely known as "FreePDF XP") and it's working like a charm.
0
Amyuni PDF Converter (Commercial) Usual Disclaimer applies
0
0
Quite frankly, I use google docs and download my file as PDF from there :P
http://www.cogniview.com/cc-free-pdf-converter is my favorite one to date. It's based on GhostScript, but installs as printer driver, which is a requirement for a legacy use case for me. – polemon – 2016-09-07T19:18:52.433
Maybe you could give us some details on what you mean by "better". Better quality, more features, or what? – Christian Davén – 2009-07-15T09:36:56.240