What does "delayed start" do in startup type for a Windows service?

84

12

What is the difference between Automatic and Automatic (Delayed Start) for a property setting for a Windows service? i.e. what do I gain or lose by setting my service as one or the other?

Running the service on Windows Server 2008 x64

Guy

Posted 2010-10-27T23:36:51.067

Reputation: 3 367

Related on Stack Overflow, detailed answers: “Automatic” vs “Automatic (Delayed start)”

– Bacco – 2018-06-10T21:20:14.587

Answers

94

A service marked as Automatic (Delayed Start) will start shortly after all other services designated as Automatic have been started. In my experience, this means that they are started 1-2 minutes after the computer boots.

The setting is most useful in lessening the "mad rush" for resources when a machine boots.

Note that when you have 20 services all being started at the same time, each will start up slower as it competes with the others for slices of the machine's precious resources (CPU/RAM/Disk/Network). That is, each service takes longer to become available!

If you have a few services that are critical, then you may want to set those few to Automatic and set as many of the others as you can to Automatic (Delayed Start). This will ensure that the critical services get the most resources early and become available sooner, while the non-critical services start a bit later (which by definition is ok).

CoreTech

Posted 2010-10-27T23:36:51.067

Reputation: 1 206

7

Further to @TomWijsman, you can apparently set the delay on a service-by-service basis by adding a DWORD for HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\<service name>\AutoStartDelay.

– Stajs – 2016-07-26T03:25:17.197

41Indeed, after handling the Non-Delayed Start services it will queue a worker thread which has a default delay of 120 seconds, which can be overridden by the AutoStartDelay value in HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control. When this worked thread runs the Delayed Start services are handled and when they are done the SCM signals the event \BaseNamedObjects\SC_AutoStartComplete... – Tamara Wijsman – 2011-05-20T23:05:59.740

8

From my understanding, it's simply a delay before launching the service.

Later versions of Windows introduced this to ensure that they didn't trip over each other's feet during the boot process (having a gazillion processes starting up at the same time is not conducive to performance).

The documentation for this feature states that services marked thus will be started "shortly after boot", hopefully once the boot-time-required services have settled down a little.

user53528

Posted 2010-10-27T23:36:51.067

Reputation:

0

This is also used when you want to delay the start of a service to allow other services to start completely, such as the SCCM Client, which does a delayed start to allow the WMI service to start fully as it is dependent on it being fully up and running.

John Dean

Posted 2010-10-27T23:36:51.067

Reputation: 1

1I'll note that such a requirement is a sign of negligence on the part of the service author. The correct way to solve such a problem is to use an explicit service dependency. – Brian – 2019-09-09T21:03:57.760

0

This is mostly used for services that starts on with AD accounts. If the service is trying to start before the server has network connection to contact the DC, it will fail and sometimes the system gets stuck and gets unreachable.

The delay ensures the service will start once network connection is up in order to use the AD account for it.

No_Name

Posted 2010-10-27T23:36:51.067

Reputation: 1

-1

Here's an example. I have a SonarQube service that depends on my MySQL database service. So, I set the MySQL service to automatic to get the database up and running when the machine boots. I have the SonarQube service set to the automatic (delayed) start to make sure it starts up AFTER the database service it depends upon is started.

If you have a dependency like this it can be helpful to use the delayed start to make sure dependent services start up in the right order.

Russ Jackson

Posted 2010-10-27T23:36:51.067

Reputation: 107

10If you have a dependency like this, the correct way to handle it is to explicitly configure a service to depend on the other one, rather than waiting a couple of minutes and hoping it has started. – Massimo – 2016-07-20T22:06:42.810

Thanks. Perhaps you can explain how to do that? And, seems that if it works it is correct. Maybe what you recommend is "better", which I wouldn't disagree with? – Russ Jackson – 2016-07-30T14:58:25.177