2
On my work PC, I'm running a RAID 1 currently.
I have an opportunity to upgrade my system and I'm wondering what is the best setup I can use.
I have 4 available hard drives and I definitely need fault-tolerance. I heard that RAID 10 is better than RAID 5.
Which configuration should I go with?
Travis
Posted 2009-07-15T15:59:16.587
Reputation: 2 125
3
Raid 10 is better than raid5
Personally, I feel raid5 is a bit of a waste on 4 disks - it leaves you with the capacity of n-1 disks whereas raid10 gives you a capacity of n/2 disks. If you have 10 disks then there's a sigificant amount of space lost by choosing raid10, but with 4 disks it's not nearly as significant.
If you can afford to give up the extra space then go with raid 10.
theotherreceive
Posted 2009-07-15T15:59:16.587
Reputation: 798
1
Raid 10 is a massive waste of space, and the benefits you might get in redundancy can be just as easily achieved with sort sort of offsite or cloud backup. Raid 5 is usually good enough since it's only really broken if two drives fail, which is extremely rare.
user1509
Posted 2009-07-15T15:59:16.587
Reputation: 21
1If you had 4 500gb disks, then you're looking at a total usable space of 1.5gb vs 1gb (for raid5 vs. raid10). That isn't really a massive waste of space for something that will be faster. – theotherreceive – 2009-07-15T16:10:06.753
I guess that depends how big your work's hardware budget is... – user1509 – 2009-07-15T16:14:03.453
"if two drives fail, which is extremely rare" - this is only rare if your disks are uncorrelated. Example: we bought a server with 4 disks, all were from the same batch, one failed after ~1000 hours, another a few hundred hours later. A bad batch, probably (manufacturer replaced them without any opposition at all, I suspect we weren't the only ones affected; the other two are still in service AFAIK). – Piskvor left the building – 2012-05-02T14:59:17.290
1Well, RAID 10 is certainly the "Rolls-Royce" of RAID configruations. Guess it really boils down to a) do I really feel I need it, and b) can I afford to buy that many disks... – marc_s – 2009-07-15T16:08:12.387
c) Does my RAID adapter support RAID10? – Russ Warren – 2009-07-15T16:12:27.323
"raid5 is a bit of a waste on 4 disks" - more than that: on an array this small, it's outright dangerous ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID_5_write_hole et al) when compared to RAID 10.
– Piskvor left the building – 2012-05-02T14:54:59.463