The Necessity of Atheism

If ignorance of nature gave birth to gods, knowledge of nature is made for their destruction.

Going One God Further
Atheism
Key Concepts
Articles to not believe in
Notable heathens
v - t - e

'The Necessity of Atheism' is an essay in English by the poet Percy Bysshe ShelleyFile:Wikipedia's W.svg when he was a student at Oxford University. The essay was printed in 1811 and was met with critical scorn and horror, prompting Oxford to suspend him temporarily once he admitted to be the essay's author. The essay explores themes such as life, consciousness and perception to make the argument that God is a superstition to be disbelieved. It also quotes influential authors of ancient Rome who professed disbelief.

Shelley was one of the most influential poets of the Romantic era known for poems such as Ozymandias.

Quote:
“”Hence it is evident that, having no proofs from either of the three sources of conviction, the mind cannot believe the existence of a creative God: it is also evident that, as belief is a passion of the mind, no degree of criminality is attachable to disbelief; and that they only are reprehensible who neglect to remove the false medium through which their mind views any subject of discussion. Every reflecting mind must acknowledge that there is no proof of the existence of a Deity.


God is an hypothesis, and, as such, stands in need of proof: the onus probandi rests on the theist. Sir Isaac Newton says: Hypotheses non fingo, quicquid enim ex phaenomenis non deducitur hypothesis, vocanda est, et hypothesis vel metaphysicae, vel physicae, vel qualitatum occultarum, seu mechanicae, in philosophia locum non habent. To all proofs of the existence of a creative God apply this valuable rule.

Source
This article is a stub.
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.
gollark: I mean, if you believe Religion 1 and believe that everyone who believes Religion 2 will go to hell and suffer forever, then you obviously don't want Religion 2 to spread.
gollark: They're pretty rational if you actually believe your religion is true, though.
gollark: Looking at religious conflicts probably doesn't require knowing about all the deep details of the religions involved, because people do tribalism and probably do not meaningfully care about the actual underlying point.
gollark: You can just study history, though.
gollark: Why?
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.