Out-of-place fossils

According to creationists, out-of-place fossils are fossils which are somewhere that they shouldn't be, which disproves either (a) radiometric dating or (b) evolutionary and fossil history. Out-of-place fossils are basically out-of-place artifacts, but for creationism.

The divine comedy
Creationism
Running gags
Jokes aside
Blooper reel
v - t - e

Arthur Chadwick, a creationist, sums up the problems with this approach pretty well:[1]

[T]he conclusion that these findings support [creationism[note 1]] is a non sequitur until all cause for concern regarding modern contamination has been eliminated.

Examples

Notes

  1. In the reference, Chadwick is referring specifically to Roraima pollen. The general point holds true, however.
gollark: Why is it *not* a programming language?
gollark: What about Redox?
gollark: Rust can bind to those too, even Haskell can.
gollark: I'm also not very *good* at it, so the only thing I used it for was my 100-line-or-so music player thing.
gollark: Well, it has a nice type system, is fast, supports parallelism well, has the cool ownership thing for memory safety, and has good libraries.

References

  1. Arthur V. Chadwick, "Precambrian Pollen in the Grand Canyon A Reexamination," Origins, 8:1, 1981
This creationism-related article is a stub.
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.