Out-of-place fossils
According to creationists, out-of-place fossils are fossils which are somewhere that they shouldn't be, which disproves either (a) radiometric dating or (b) evolutionary and fossil history. Out-of-place fossils are basically out-of-place artifacts, but for creationism.
| The divine comedy Creationism |
 |
| Running gags |
| Jokes aside |
| Blooper reel |
|
v - t - e |
Arthur Chadwick, a creationist, sums up the problems with this approach pretty well:[1]
[T]he conclusion that these findings support [creationism[note 1]] is a non sequitur until all cause for concern regarding modern contamination has been eliminated.
Examples
- The Hakatai Shale pollen
- The Roraima pollen paradox
- The Paluxy River tracks
- The Cardiff Giant
File:Wikipedia's W.svg - one of the most famous of these supposed "out-of-place" fossils. An atheist who was fed up with the church created this 10 foot stone man to fool the masses and fool them it did.
Notes
- In the reference, Chadwick is referring specifically to Roraima pollen. The general point holds true, however.
gollark: Technically, that's not natural numbers but integers.
gollark: Amazing.
gollark: There are, and they're "randomy" through monadic IO stuff.
gollark: I don't think you can, it's a weird syntax exception.
gollark: too
References
- Arthur V. Chadwick, "Precambrian Pollen in the Grand Canyon — A Reexamination," Origins, 8:1, 1981
This creationism-related article is a stub.
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.