Dendrochronology

	The divine comedy; Creationism
	Running gags
	Biblical literalism; Young/Old Earth; Intelligent design; Creation scientists;
	Jokes aside
	Creationism and social history; Fossil fuel; Petrified forest; Punctuated equilibrium;
	Blooper reel
	Put a Sock in It; Scientists Confront Creationism; Text of Arkansas Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act; The End of Darwinism; v - t - e

Dendrochronology is the scientific method of dating the age of trees by the number of rings that they have grown. Young Earth creationists are not fans of it, because dendrochronology often finds that certain trees are older than the young Earth is supposed to be.

Clearly defined tree rings.

Methodology

Trees continually grow outward during their lifespan by surrounding the central, live section with dead cells, or bark. However, trees grow faster in summer and slower in winter, causing 'tree rings' of different growth rates to form. A tree's age can be dated to within one year by "counting" the number of these rings that a tree possesses.[1]

However, just counting the rings may lead to an inaccurate result, because of seasonal variations in ring growth and malformations. Instead, dendrochronologists determine the qualities of each ring and determine whether other local trees possess the same qualities in the same ring in a process called "skeleton plotting".[2][3] If the tree rings between different trees formed in a similar way, then it's likely that those trees have undergone the same variation at the same time. In addition to allowing more certain proof of a tree's age, it allows dendrochronologists to link together a part of the life of one tree to part of the life of another tree and make an effective "chain" of tree lives.

Creationism and dendrochronology

Young Earth creationists often doubt other forms of dating, such as radiometric dating, that invalidate their worldview of a 6,000-year-old Earth, often because those dating methods are harder to understand, more prone to potential error, and science-y. Dendrochronology, on the other hand, can be done by anyone, and feels less science-y. If a tree is proven to be older than about 4,350 years, then it is impossible for that tree to have survived the global flood, which in turn proves biblical literalism and creationism false. (Until creationists say that God protected this singular tree for ~~no apparent reason~~ reasons we cannot comprehend, which is a perfectly acceptable response which also proves that creationism is religion, not a science.)

Many tree records have been constructed that extend beyond 4,350 years old.[4] The oldest unbroken string of tree ring records go back 11,750 years,[5] while the oldest living tree is 5063 years old.[6] Both of these dates contradict young Earth creationism.

Trees contradicting the global flood

Currently unnamed

Currently unnamed is 5070 years old (720 too many),[6][7] and is the oldest known living tree dated by dendrochronology.

Prometheus

Prometheus^{File:Wikipedia's W.svg} is 4901 years old (551 too many).[6] Prometheus was cut down in 1964, and its age is adjusted as if it had continued living.

Methuselah

Methuselah^{File:Wikipedia's W.svg} is 4852 years old (502 too many).[6][8]

King Clone

King Clone^{File:Wikipedia's W.svg}, a creosote bush ring, is approximately 11,700 years old.[9][10][11][12] King Clone was dated by Frank Vasek and Leonel Sternberg using two methods: First, the number of rings in the plant and by calculating the annual annual growth, and second by radiocarbon dating the wood of the centermost portion of the plant.

Old Tjikko

Old Tjikko^{File:Wikipedia's W.svg} is approximately 9,550 years old.[13][14] Old Tjikko was dated using carbon-14 dating, which certainly shows us that Old Tjikko is too old for young earth creationism but is inaccurate to the year.

Llangernyw Yew

The Llangernyw Yew^{File:Wikipedia's W.svg} is approximately 4,000-5,000 years old.[15][16] Unfortunately, yews are notably difficult to date, and this one has weathered worse than most, which makes this weak evidence.

Jomon Sugi

Jōmon Sugi^{File:Wikipedia's W.svg} is 2100-7000 years old.

gollark: Okay, done.

gollark: I see.

gollark: I have. I'm busy with carcinization.

gollark: Wondrous, fairly good HTML (I always ignore it telling me to add a `lang` attribute, for purposes).