Boston Tea Party

The Boston Tea Party (December 16, 1773) was an act of vandalism which has been highly mythologised into an act of democratic rebellion. The incident was led by Samuel Adams and other members of the Sons of Liberty, who thinly disguised themselves as Native Americans[1] and boarded ships of the British East India Company, dumping 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor (thus making the tea undrinkable, even for Americans). However, this would have been acceptable if only the colonists had thought to pre-boil the ocean and add a splash of milk.

Bostonians and other colonists had been subjected to a tax on tea as well as paint, paper, and glass with the passage of the Townshend Acts in 1767.[2] Protests and non-importation movements by the colonists led to the repeal of the Townshend duties in 1770, with the exception of the duty on tea. In 1773, Parliament passed the Tea Act which allowed the struggling East India Tea Company to sell a half million pounds of tea in the colonies while bypassing the importation taxes normally paid under the British Navigation Acts. For all practical purposes, the 1773 Tea Act gave the East India Tea Company a monopoly by allowing them to charge less than other merchants.[3]

Despite the fact they were now paying less for tea, American colonists protested the act, not so much because they didn't like cheap tea, but because the tea was still taxed under the Townshend Act, which they opposed under the premise of "no taxation without representation"- the colonists were unable to vote in Parliament's elections, but Parliament had no problem levying taxes on the colonists, and strangely enough, the colonists didn't particularly like this.[4] Incidents like the Boston Tea Party were avoided in other port cities, when East India ships left without unloading their cargo in the face of protests by colonists. Massachusetts governor Thomas Hutchinson, however, issued an order forbidding ships to leave port without unloading their cargo, and this was a key factor that led to the Boston Tea Party.

It was during this period that coffee became the morning beverage of choice in the American colonies.

Souvenirs

Due to much of the dumped tea washing up on the other side of Boston Harbor, on what is now Revere Beach, to this day one can buy small bottles of seawater with genuine Tea Party leaves floating around in them.

Modern wannabes
See the main article on this topic: Tea Party movement

In the early months of the Obama Administration as the President moved to stabilize the falling economy, semi-grassroots movements calling themselves "Tea Parties" sprung up across the United States in "protest." They adopted the backronym "Taxed Enough Already", heavily ironic since US taxes are at their lowest point since the Eisenhower era. In Cape Coral, Florida, the local Tea Party was denied a permit to peaceably assemble, which resulted in a great hue and cry on the Internet, but no civil disobedience.

King George III must be kicking himself in his grave, realizing now that he could have quashed the American Revolution simply by denying them permits. The movement spread and continued to exist in 2012, but after suffering some setbacks in the 2012 elections and fiscal cliff, has slowly fallen out of regard and drifts farther and farther to the far-right.

Additional reading
  • John Ferling, A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic (Oxford University Press, 2003)
  • Robert Middlekauff, The Glorious Cause1048247 09:59, 26 April 2007 (EDT) (rev.ed.) (Oxford University Press, 2005).
  • Harlow Giles Unger, American Tempest: How the Boston Tea Party Sparked A Revolution (Da Capo Press, 2011)
gollark: Have you explained that hyperfocus on academic stuff probably won't actually make you better off?
gollark: It's probably just mucking with DNS, so you likely do not need that.
gollark: I see. These things are probably easy to get around.
gollark: Discord runs over the internet.
gollark: > my dads blocking web traffic to everything except my schoolYou're on Discord now.

References
  1. This was not an attempt to blame the act on the natives, but rather, as a statement much like dressing as a pirate today. The Colonies had a very strange love-hate relationship with the various tribes. On the one hand, Manifest Destiny and racism, but on the other, a very much romanticised "Noble Savage" view. In the early days, many native tribes posed an existential threat to the colonies; colonists kept sneaking off to join them. Turns out when one side is offering you indentured servitude (i.e., debt slavery), puritanical religion, and a noticeable lack of vaginal intercourse, the other side starts looking pretty good.
  2. Great Britain : Parliament - The Townshend Act, November 20, 1767
  3. Great Britain : Parliament - The Tea Act, May 10, 1773
  4. Even in Britain at that time, only 10% of adult males were entitled to vote.
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.