A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care

A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care is a 2013 report produced by John T. James, Ph.D., that estimates the number of incidences of patient harm or death caused by modern hospital care in the US. Overall, the report found that, between 2008 and 2011, "a lower limit of 210,000 deaths per year was associated with preventable harm in hospitals" but "the true number of premature deaths associated with preventable harm to patients was estimated at more than 400,000 per year". Further, "[s]erious harm seems to be 10- to 20-fold more common than lethal harm."[1] Altogether, this would make medical accidents the third leading cause of death in the US, after heart disease and cancer. (The CDC's estimates currently place accidents at fourth.[2])

Against allopathy
Alternative medicine
Clinically unproven
v - t - e

The study itself appears valid, and evidence that further and ongoing medical reform must be done. The report gained significant media attention,[3] not least because it disparaged the medical profession. However, the report has been used by all too many people opposed to "allopathic" medicine as evidence that allopathic medicine is bad, and you should prefer whatever it is that they're pushing.[4][5]

There are several problems with this view.

Types of Reporting

It is important to understand which statistics for patient harm are being utilized. A number of hospitals have been moving towards open reporting of events with the potential for patient harm. This often includes events that don't actually reach the patient or cause them harm.[6] It can be anything from a scale that is not well labeled leading to the possibility of dosage errors, medication errors in transcriptions caught by pharmacists,[7] to serious safety events leading to harm or death. They use open evidence-based approaches to identify, find and correct the cause for future patients. Often publishing research and quality improvement that show positive results for other facilities to emulate in order to improve patient care.[8]

This system does not exist for alternative treatments. Harm is generally shown in news articles and lawsuits with little interest in building a similar systems. Alternative medical practitioners often disparage critics and those looking to shine a light on their practices.

Allopathic vs human error

All but one of the Predictable Adverse Events (PAEs) looked for are human errors. Equipment that was not sterilized properly. A surgeon's carelessness. Miscommunication between doctor and nurse. Lack of patient compliance. If anything, the study shows that we imperfect humans make the error, not the "allopathic" system behind it. Even if we assume that "naturopathic" medicine worked and we switched to an entirely naturopathic system, we'd see the same kind of issues.

There are some studies in effect for naturopathic treatments which show the same types of human error.[9] This includes improperly placed needles going deeper than intended, puncturing major organs that needed to be surgically removed,[10] needles accidentally being left in patients, and infections caused by reusing needles without sterilizing them.[11]

Scale

Even some acupuncture proponents admit "more people use hospitals than acupuncture in the U.S.", though they argue "that doesn’t come close to touching the difference in death rate."[4]

The problem here is that, unlike hospital deaths, which are increasingly well-reported, deaths from acupuncture or herbal medicine or faith healing or almost any alternative medicine have effectively no reporting system. It's entirely possible that alternative medicines kill at higher rates than allopathic medicines. Little is known due to the lack of regulation on supplements and treatments until regulators start looking into incidences of people being hospitalized at legitimate medical centers.

gollark: If some things make it smaller it means they appear repeatedly. So this leaks secret data.
gollark: With compression, an attacker can make the client browser send different things in the headers it DOES control, and see which ones cause the size to be smaller.
gollark: Or obviously the cookies.
gollark: It's quite interesting. Basically, the cross origin model allows other sites to send arbitrary POST/GET requests with some constraints on headers with access to browser cookies and such, but not see the response.
gollark: Header compression is actually supported in some stuff but disabled due to security issues due to the awful cross origin model.

References
  1. James, John T. "A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care." Journal of patient safety 9.3 (2013): 122-128.
  2. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm
  3. http://www.forbes.com/sites/leahbinder/2013/09/23/stunning-news-on-preventable-deaths-in-hospitals/
  4. http://www.abetterwaytohealth.com/acupuncture-scientific-evidence
  5. http://www.infowars.com/foundation-of-medical-reality-explodes/
  6. Beth Israel Medical Center — Eliminating Preventable Harm at BIDMC
  7. Medication errors: the impact of prescribing and transcribing errors on preventable harm in hospitalised patients
  8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23860193 A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care
  9. Acupuncture treatment is not as safe as advertised
  10. Dozens killed by incorrectly placed acupuncture needles: Professor of complementary medicine calls for adequate training for all acupuncture practitioners after survey reveals punctured hearts and lungs among causes of death over past 45 years by Ian Sample (Monday 18 October 2010 12.21 EDT) The Guardian
  11. An outbreak of post-acupuncture cutaneous infection due to Mycobacterium abscessus - 40 people affected
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.