Thought Nibbler (3.5e Creature)

This creature looks like a little squid with bat wings. It has red skin and blue tentacles.

	Thought Nibbler
Size/Type:	Tiny Aberration
Hit Dice:	1/2d8 (2 hp)
Initiative:	+5
Speed:	5 ft. (1 square), swim 40 ft., fly 30 ft. (good)
Armor Class:	22 (+5 Dex, +5 natural, +2 size), touch 17, flat-footed 17
Base Attack/Grapple:	0/-12
Attack:	tentacle +5 melee (1d4-4 plus memory loss)
Full Attack:	4 tentacles +5 melee (1d4-4 plus memory loss)
Space/Reach:	5 ft./5 ft.
Special Attacks:	Improved grab, wring
Special Qualities:	—
Saves:	Fort 0, Ref +5, Will +2
Abilities:	Str 2, Dex 20, Con 10, Int 10, Wis 11, Cha 10
Skills:	Hide +17, Listen +4, Spot +4
Feats:	Weapon Finesse
Environment:	Temperate aquatic
Organization:	Team (2-4), group (5-10)
Challenge Rating:	2
Treasure:	None
Alignment:	Always neutral
Advancement:	—
Level Adjustment:	—

A thought nibbler is a strange creature that feeds on the brains of other living beings. The nature of this rare creatures is probably related to wizardry.

Combat:

Thought nibblers attack intelligent beings to feed from their brains. They are patient and choose the correct time and place, when their target is alone.

Improved Grab (Ex): To use this ability, a thought nibbler must hit with a tentacle attack. It can then attempt to start a grapple as a free action without provoking an attack of opportunity.

Memory Loss (Su): If a thought nibbler hits with at least one tentacle, its victim must succeed at a Fortitude save (DC 15) or become stunned for 1 round, and lose last 1d4 hours memory, this includes the fact of been attacked by the nibbler. The subject can restore its memory only through a heal spell or by a memory restoration with limited wish, wish, or miracle.

Wring (Ex): If a thought nibbler hits with its 4 tentacles and maintains a hold, it can attempt to drain Intelligence points at a rate of 2d4 per round. A though nibbler leaves when it has drained a total of 20 points of intelligence.

Back to Main Page → 3.5e Homebrew → Creatures → CR 2

gollark: If it's really easy to convert some new opinion into binding law, then people will do it lots and you get badness.

gollark: And I don't trust the government much either, because they tend to grow excessively and/or do stupid/powergrabby things.

gollark: I don't really trust "the aggregated opinion of the majority" to be remotely sensible.

gollark: People inevitably want to enforce whatever their particular bizarre views are on everyone, which causes badness and require systems which create more badness.

gollark: See, I personally support governments doing as little as possible because they cannot be trusted.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.