Template talk:Locked Page

I can't edit this, but to make it a little less visually imposing I made some changes that I would love to see implemented. This design works much better in conjunction with the table of contents that is present on most pages.
--Meep (talk) 04:35, 25 March 2018 (MDT)

The primary contributor has requested
no further edits to this page
This page is considered complete and balanced. As such, the page has been locked so that only administrators can edit it. If you wish to make alterations to this page, or you see an error, please discuss it on the talk page.


Upon lack of reply and further dissatisfaction with seeing the large banner across what are to be the best pages we have to offer. I propose yet another even smaller form of the banner for consideration, this time with the text visible upon being moused over. Clicking either the link to the talk page or the lock itself will take you there. --Meep (talk) 21:35, 7 April 2018 (MDT)

talk page
primary contributor
I like this smaller version, and I imagine no one else may respond. I will unlock this page for the time being. --Green Dragon (talk) 23:03, 8 April 2018 (MDT)
Its now smaller and less visually intrusive! Thanks for unlocking it for me. --Meep (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2018 (MDT)
Where do you want to include the expanded information about locked pages (or what should the talk page link be for)? --Green Dragon (talk) 08:20, 9 April 2018 (MDT)
Currently I have it set up so that if you hover over the lock or the talk page link it reveals a tooltip with the expanded information --Meep (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2018 (MDT)
While I do like the small locked template, it doesn't appear to work on mobile. Because of this, I would prefer it if the template still said why a page was locked(current version or condensed revision).--Blobby383b (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2018 (MDT)
I included the reason with the template, as hidden text. Does this work for everyone? --Green Dragon (talk) 23:28, 9 April 2018 (MDT)

Why does the template now just say "talk page" and "primary contributor"? Is this a bug? Because right now it's ugly and not informative, even when expanded. Meep's first suggestion at the top looks better, IMO. If we're going with the current look, we might as well just remove it altogether.--GamerAim (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2018 (MDT)

How about now? Could you maybe give an example of what you are talking about if it is something else? --Green Dragon (talk) 08:58, 10 April 2018 (MDT)
This one, like Meep suggested above:
The primary contributor has requested
no further edits to this page
This page is considered complete and balanced. As such, the page has been locked so that only administrators can edit it. If you wish to make alterations to this page, or you see an error, please discuss it on the talk page.
If needed, I can try to implement show/hide functionality so it doesn't take up so much space on mobile. Or make it auto-size or something.--GamerAim (talk) 09:50, 10 April 2018 (MDT)
I find that rather obtrusive, so I say, yes, try out some things with it. --Green Dragon (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2018 (MDT)
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.