Talk:Steel, Carbonized (3.5e Equipment)

Realism

Okay... I'm a mechanical engineer. This material is crap, all of it's stats are way off, and it's called high carbon steel for through hardening or carburized steel for shell hardening, and the properties rather complex, but in no way similar, at any hardness level to the comparison made by this ridiculous assessment of what high carbon steel should be. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 136.224.141.144 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 24 April 2007 (MDT). Please sign your posts.

Yes, and we're people who gather around a table every week, bounce little pieces of plastic around, and pretend to kill dragons. We don't pretend to be experts (unless we feel like playing an NPC class). Perhaps you could enlighten us as to what the approximate realistic values protraining to Carbonized Steel should be, instead of telling us it's wrong then doing absolutely nothing about it? Thank you. Pwnester 15:42, 2 November 2008 (MST)
gollark: The worst that can happen is that you offend them, they report it to Discord, and you are banned forever.
gollark: Apparently?
gollark: Have you *seen* <#424394851170385923>?
gollark: I was referring to "is [...] degenerated".
gollark: Should you really be using the perfect tense there?
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.