Talk:Running Attack (3.5e Feat)

Redundant?

Isn't this redundant with the SRD charge action? --Cúthalion 12:19, 5 February 2007 (MST)

Not completely, but it is better than another feat called Fleet of Foot and should likely be changed because of this. Perhaps it should allow 3x movement on a charge rather than 2x. Aarnott 13:53, 5 February 2007 (MST)

Also this feat cannot be changed as it is OGL and not GNU FDL. Sorry, however if you want it to be "fixed" you have to bring it up with the people over at the NBoF. --Green Dragon 19:33, 5 February 2007 (MST)

The difference between a Running Attack and a charge is, that the charge must be in a straight line, while a Running Attack could be in any direction. Also, charge gives -2 AC +2 to hit, while this one gives -2 to hit. If you ask me, the difference is small but the possible confusion pretty high, so I would delete this feat.

Even if it does not get deleted, the title needs to be changed to Running Attack (DnD Feat). On top of that Category:Feat is missing in the article. --Mkill 12:21, 19 June 2007 (MDT)

gollark: Although if you want to maintain good current quality of life for *you* via slavery you'll need most of this infrastructure anyway.

gollark: Since nowhere has ALL the stuff you need you need a ton of transportation.

gollark: But then you have to locate factories in places with the right minerals.

gollark: 2% or 0.5% efficiency or something, but they conveniently store to chemical energy

gollark: I was thinking just in general.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.