Talk:Researcher (5e Background)

Article Spotlight

Researcher! That's what I've been handed and will do my best since I am not a fan of homebrew backgrounds.
This article is more than complete. The community has whipped up full and thoughtful characteristics for this background. There is a decent description and the feature isn't too bad. I myself enjoy characters that are like this, but not exactly this. D&D is adventuring to me! Who wants to play a character that sits in a library? Maybe that's the issue with the article; it is written as though you are going to be this vs as a background. Something that your character was or did. Again, I do think this was put together very nicely. It is a few years and only received a handful of edits the last year or so and could possibly be a quality article. Cheers Red Leg Leo (talk) 09:52, 10 December 2020 (MST)

gollark: The split in what?

gollark: I don't think this substantively addresses what I said.

gollark: It seems that you explicitly suggested it was good because it gave more power to rural people than they would otherwise get based on population.

gollark: According to my badness determination metrics.

gollark: What I am saying is that deliberately designing an electoral system and then messing with it so that a particular group consistently gets outsized amounts of power is bad, and that it isn't particularly justified based on "cultural differences" because there are lots of culturally different groups.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.