Talk:Nocturne (5e Race)

— This article became a featured article! — Geodude (talk | contribs | email)‎‎ . . 01:08, 31 October 2018 (MDT)

Featured Article Nominee

I know this may be sudden or quick for such a new article but I find very well designed and flavorful. I particularly enjoy the "optional rule" and references listed that were used for inspiration. Also, find the quote and image to compliment this race very well. But! this page needs to be supported, commented, or opposed from within the community, and double checked for featured article formatting and content standards. BigShotFancyMan (talk) 07:49, 14 June 2018 (MDT)

  • Support: Per above. I'd even prefer if this was the Nocturne race instead of variant, especially considering the "original" is CfD. BigShotFancyMan (talk) 07:49, 14 June 2018 (MDT)
  • Comment: Oh wow. Glad you like it bsfm. I feel like a pokemon master at this point, except with FA's instead of pokemon... even though I do a lot of work with MetalShadowOverlord on all his pokemon races but I digress. I can't seem to find any issue with this other than a personal preference to not insta-support something I've been the primary contributor for. So I'll see if others see an issue with it and fix those as they come up but it might as well be a support at this point. —ConcealedLight (talk) 08:28, 14 June 2018 (MDT)
You're very welcome! and well said on FA=pokemon. BigShotFancyMan (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2018 (MDT)
  • Support: I really like the lore and the flavor of this race. I think they could be a lot of fun to play Varkarrus (talk) 10:28, 7 July 2018 (MDT)
  • Support: This race is just oozing with flavor, and I can't really say there is any part of this race that doesn't feel unique or well done. I put my full support behind this becoming a FA.--Blobby383b (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2018 (MDT)
  • Comment: With Shadow Movement, instead of using 5 feet increments isn't the precedent to use 1 foot increments, with difficult terrian (movement)
This is correct. Good eye. —ConcealedLight (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2018 (MDT)
  • Support: If it wasn't apparent before it is now. —ConcealedLight (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2018 (MDT)
  • Support: This is well made, with useful fluff. Seeing as we have reached concensus, this may become a Featured Article. --Green Dragon (talk) 00:38, 31 October 2018 (MDT)
Based on this, I will succeed this nomination. — Geodude (talk | contribs | email)‎‎ . . 01:08, 31 October 2018 (MDT)
  • Comment: I like everything about this race however could you potentially make a change to the way the Fellvision feat is written? due to "being able to see in darkness as if it were bright light" my DM effectively made my character blind because of sunlight sensitivity and then in order to make my character "not blind" he nerfed me. Zman55
Your DM is not interpreting that trait correctly. It's sunlight sensitivity, not light sensitivity. — Geodude (talk | contribs | email)‎‎ . . 17:58, 5 June 2019 (MDT)


Came back with some useful NPC's from this race, easy to make commoners for the Shadowfell region, which in turn, made for a great sidekick for one of my PC's. --Cransiosis (talk) 23:00, 9 April 2019 (MDT)

gollark: Fair, although they're somewhat more *complex* than "magic uninterceptable channel"l.
gollark: So only stuff like PotatOS ship strong crypto nowadays.
gollark: The other way would be some sort of hypercomplex crypto solution, but it would probably have its own problems and I think SquidDev said no to including that sort of thing in core CraftOS.
gollark: If they made it magically uninterceptable, that would be uncool and bad for learning.
gollark: Anyway, if they removed the rednet API, that would break 12471892518295 programs but stop people using a not-secure-even-though-it-looks-like-it-is API.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.