Talk:Legend of the Swamp (3.5e Prestige Class)

Rating

Power - 4.75/5 I give this class a 4.75 out of 5 because it seemed fitting but perhaps a tad too powerful too quickly. --24.17.130.177 14:51, 30 September 2009 (MDT)

Wording - 4/5 I give this class a 4.5 out of 5 because it was full of description and clear to read>>> --24.17.130.177 14:51, 30 September 2009 (MDT)

Formatting - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because is defined but needed to invent some rules to be created --24.17.130.177 14:51, 30 September 2009 (MDT)

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because it captures a archetype that no other has touched. --24.17.130.177 14:51, 30 September 2009 (MDT)

Rating

Power - 4.5/5 I give this class a 4.5 out of 5 because many of the abilities are useful, powerful and level appropriate. --~~~~

Wording - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because, this class came alive for a character I made. Thanks, on the money. --~~~~

Formatting - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because this isn't a standard character setup, and a little hard for my DM but makes sense overall. --~~~~

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because this is an original concept, an archetype not achieved by wizards, well done. --~~~~

gollark: It's based entirely on string substitution.

gollark: What about, say, https://esolangs.org/wiki/%2F%2F%2F ?

gollark: I see. You have very broad "equivalence classes" then.

gollark: Also esolangs, which are often built on very weird paradigms.

gollark: I mean, there are some random stack-based things, some of which are even seriously used ish, which aren't particularly C, Haskell, Prolog or Lisp-y.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.