Talk:Knights of the Zodiac (5e Class)

There are a lot of things that need to be cleared up about this class. For one, language and grammar need to be straightened out. A lot of the abilities in this class aren't well explained. For example, things like Kamui, cosmo, and sign attribute/attack all go unexplained. Along with this, the armor (or Cloth, whichever you prefer), despite being the focal point of the class, is also not well explained. The benefits for upgrading the armor into Silver and Gold are lost to me (Unless they are tied to increases in AC), What players can and cannot do without the armor is unspecified, and the Pegasus Armor seems superior to the others. While I think I understand the meaning behind it, Never Twice could be elaborated on (does it refer to all attacks, techniques like a dragon's breath attack, or is it up to the DM?) The page occasionally refers to weapons, which confuses me. I was under the impression that this class was mostly based on unarmed combat. Finally, why are players given an urn and armor that is outclassed by the Cloths?

Apologies if I sound overly critical. I just think that this class has a lot of promise if some corrections are made and some balance is applied.

Brettguy