Talk:Bardbarian (3.5e Prestige Class)

Rating

Balance - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because it's absurdly breakable. The capstone alone could easily give an optimiser +30 to every roll they make in that rage. And Ragesong allows for infinite Rage if you know what you're doing. --124.180.220.88 03:32, 29 July 2014 (MDT)

Wording - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because read as RAW, the capstone applies to every roll you make in a rage. That includes Climb checks, Bluff checks, everything. That's just the tip of the iceberg. --124.180.220.88 03:32, 29 July 2014 (MDT)

Formatting - 4/5 I give this class a X out of 5 because it's well-formatted, at least. --124.180.220.88 03:32, 29 July 2014 (MDT)

Flavor - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because you tried. The flavour, while a bit lacking, is still there and still makes me want to like this class. --124.180.220.88 03:32, 29 July 2014 (MDT)

gollark: ++magic py await bot.user.set_nickname("LyricLy®")

gollark: NO EVIDENCE of actual implementation (except maybe the parser)NO COHERENT SPEC describing how any if it actually worksLANGUAGES WERE NOT MEANT TO HAVE TYPES BE TRAITS OR WHATEVERWanted to use macros anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that. It was called Lisp."Hello I would like impl<u8(a)> T(a) apples please" - statements made by the utterly Deranged.And after all the computers and compiler tooling we gave them!

gollark: And yet.

gollark: Well, the lesson is more that LyricLy's language ideas are bad and impossible.

gollark: *You* thought of then made Macron?

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.