SRD Talk:Shield Bash

Source?

This text appears to be derived from the description of the heavy shield on p. 125 of the PHB, but with the word "heavy" deleted wherever it occurs. Is this observation correct? This seems a gross violation of SRD inalterability. The result is also wrong -- a light shield should be treated as a light weapon, not a "one-handed" weapon. Contrast d20srd.org. –Cúthalion (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2007 (MDT)

P.S. I'm not sure whether I'm flattered or offended to be told that I'm a human. –Cúthalion (talk) 21:41, 4 July 2007 (MDT)

gollark: * would have committed a crime under my proposed law, even

gollark: "committed a crime under my proposed law" doesn't mean "committed a crime".

gollark: *Did* they? I don't think it's illegal to accidentally introduce bugs.

gollark: Punishing someone after they do a thing doesn't mean that thing didn't happen, just makes other people (probably) want to do it less. People don't *want* exploits in their software, generally. It might make people more cautious, but I don't think it's worth the downsides.

gollark: Anyway, you compare it to the medical field, but that... obviously works very differently, and the licensing thing is a bit problematic there too.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.