SRD Talk:Resurrection

Conflict

Small conflict between pages Undead Type and Resurrection:

Undead Type: "Resurrection and true resurrection can affect undead creatures." (no mention about creature must be destroyed before resurrecting)
Resurrection: "You can resurrect someone killed by a death effect or someone who has been turned into an undead creature and then destroyed." (how about destroyed body of lich? no mention about soul must be free, if phylactery counts) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.118.79.28 (talk • contribs) 2011-01-12 02:14. Please sign your posts.

Don't really see a conflict. Combined the two descriptions means you can resurrect an undead creature regardless of whether or not its been destroyed. —Sledged (talk) 04:21, 12 January 2011 (MST)

Okay. I suppose it would be pretty awesome to resurrect a lich. Especially against its will. Then it be way easier to kill it. In that case bodies of those, who used Magic Jar and Astral Seed can be resurrected too despite of being soulless when destroyed. Soul Bind also fails with such a rule. Besides, it makes Resurrection spell more valuable in many cases than True Resurrection (despite being lesser level and make lesser requirements) because it says: "In addition, the subject’s soul must be free and willing to return."

Sorry if my english is too bad - it's not my native language 62.33.151.228 21:21, 12 January 2011 (MST)

gollark: Because "luck" is totally a property like that instead of a post-hoc description of low-probability events!

gollark: For example: the first person to add themselves to the candidates list on some website automatically wins.

gollark: No, there are worse ones.

gollark: Anarchist revolution!

gollark: This is why we must destroy all hierarchy.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.